Obama eyes ‘frank and fruitful’ relations with China’s new leaders
Posted: December 22, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: China, Obama, Sino-US relations, the US, Wang Qishan, Xi Jinping Leave a comment »SCMP reports: “US President Barack Obama has told Vice-Premier Wang Qishan that he will seek to maintain ‘energetic, frank and fruitful’ relations with China’s new leadership, state media reported yesterday.
“Xinhua quoted Obama as saying he was also looking forward to his first meeting with new Communist Party chief Xi Jinping since his own re-election early last month and the naming of a new Politburo Standing Committee in Beijing just over a week later.
“Wang’s meeting with Obama in Washington during his three-day visit to the United States was the first face-to-face meeting between a member of China’s new generation of leaders and the US president since Obama’s re-election.
“Wang, who was made a member of the party’s supreme Politburo Standing Committee last month and put in charge of the party’s anti-graft watchdog, said his visit would be his last to the US as a vice-premier.
“Although Washington has yet to make details of Thursday’s brief meeting at the White House public, Chinese analysts said it was symbolically important for both countries despite a lack of concrete results.
“Xinhua quoted Wang as saying that the two countries should constantly enrich and expand bilateral relations and translate their consensus and intentions into policies and actions.
“China ‘hopes to develop economic and trade co-operation with the US towards a wider range and a higher level’ so as to jointly tackle regional and global challenges, Wang said.
“Repeating recent remarks by Xi in a meeting with former US president Jimmy Carter, Wang called on the world’s two most powerful nations to ‘accumulate positive energy’ in developing their ties.
For details, please visit SCMP website at:
South China Sea dispute wrecks Asean unity
Posted: November 20, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: ASEAN, Cambodia, China, Japan, Obama, President Benigno Aquino, South China Sea disputes, the Philippines Leave a comment »SCMP reports: Consensus shattered after Manila challenges Phnom Penh’s claim that bloc had agreed not to ‘internationalise’ disputes with Beijing
“Asean unity yet again lay in tatters last night – thwarting a Chinese-backed effort to keep South China Sea territorial disputes off the agenda of today’s international leaders’ summit in Cambodia.
“Host Cambodia’s claim on Sunday that the 10 leaders of Southeast Asia had agreed not to ‘internationalise’ the issue by limiting it to meetings with China was directly challenged by the Philippines’ President Benigno Aquino.
“‘There were several views expressed yesterday on Asean unity which we did not realise would be translated into an Asean consensus,’ Aquino told fellow Asean leaders during a meeting with Japan yesterday, according to a government statement.
“‘For the record, this was not our understanding. The Asean route is not the only route for us.’
“Malaysia, Vietnam, Philippines and Brunei, dispute China’s claim to virtually the entire South China Sea.
“The deal had marked an apparent diplomatic victory for Beijing. Chinese envoys have been lobbying hard on the issue, and Cambodia – a Chinese aid recipient – was once again accused of doing Beijing’s bidding as this year’s chairman of Asean.”
For details, please visit SCMP website at:
http://www.scmp.com/news/asia/article/1086448/south-china-sea-dispute-wrecks-asean-unity
What Can US Expect from China in Dealing with North Korea
Posted: March 27, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: America, China, Kim Jong-il, Kim Jong-un, missile, North Korea, Obama Leave a comment »China is now the only country that has great influence on North Korea. In fact, Kim Jong-il went to China to get its support before he announced his choice of Kim Jong-un as his successor and Kim Jong-un cannot maintain his leadership now without Chinese support.
Obama is clever to tell North Korea that America harbors no enmity against North Korea. Without the enmity, Kim Jong-un will gradually lose his people’ and officials’ support in squandering money to develop sophisticated weapons. However, Obama seems to regret that China is unable to help US resolve the North Korean problem.
Kim Jong-un’s priority now is to develop economy to feed his people and improve their living standards. In so doing, he needs Chinese funds, technology and management experience. China, however, needs North Korea’s labor and natural resources. US pressure on North Korea over its weapon development will only enhance North Korea’s dependence on China and facilitate China’s exploitation of North Korean resources.
Why shall China help America ease the tension between America and North Korea? Will China gain anything in doing so? Normalization of relations between America and North Korea will enable America to compete with China in investing in North Korea and exploiting the human and natural resources there. Obama seems to forget: the driving force behind international affairs is interest.
Why is North Korea not willing to give up its development of carrier missiles that is too expensive for a small and poor country? It wants to blackmail America since America is willing to pay. It may perhaps be profited if America is willing to give it substantial compensation.
As I pointed out in my previous post, America shall just ignore North Korea’s threat and treat it with contempt. It shall focus on its own domestic problems and let the UN, South Korea and Japan to deal with the issue.
Arms Race between China and America
Posted: March 5, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: aircraft carrier, America, arms race, China, GPS, LPD, Obama, Russia, Su 35, Syria, Xi Jinping 3 Comments »While America is reducing its military budget, China announced an 11% increase.
China has stepped up its military buildup since America’s involvement in South China Sea dispute. It conducted the first test of its aircraft carrier in a hurry last August when the boat had not yet been able to sail on its own.
Obama’s unprecedented participation in ASEAN summit meeting on November 11, 2011 and announcement of America’s return to Asia encouraged China’s neighbors to confront China in their border disputes with China. China has further stepped up its military buildup since then. It conducted two further tests of its aircraft carrier, launched its third 071 landing platform dock (LPD) in September 2011 and a fourth during the Chinese Lunar New Year Festival in early 2012. The Festival is the most important holiday for Chinese people and normally, nobody worked on the holiday. (071 LPD is a 20,000-ton amphibious transport dock similar to the US-built San Antonio-class LPD).
In addition, China put its own satellite GPS system into trial operation and declared its plan to launch 6 more satellites in 2012 to improve the system. Guided by this system, China’s missiles and bombs will be much more accurate.
Since it joined Russia in vetoing UN resolution on Syria, Russia has resumed discussion on sales of its most advanced Su 35 planes to China and according to sources, this time China wants transfer of technology to enable joint production of the planes with Russia. With its $3 trillion foreign exchange reserve, China is able to purchase as many advanced planes as Russia is willing to sell.
Chinese vice president’s recent visit to America has reduced some tension between China and America, but the budget increase proves that China keeps on intensifying its arms race with America. Chinese military budget appears to be much smaller than America’s, but China can assign military research and development projects to its state-owned enterprises (SOEs) without government funding as such projects may also be useful for civil purposes. Even if they are solely for military purpose, China can fund the projects by reducing the state-owned enterprises’ distribution of profit to the government. That will certainly not be reflected in its military budget.
In 2011, Chinese SOEs’ profit totaled $357 billion, of which 10% to 15%, i.e. US$35.7 to US$53.5 billion shall be delivered to the government, quite a substantial amount compared with China’s military budget of $110 billion.
Moreover, Chinese government may also order state-owned enterprises to provide it with military hardware at a very low price without any profit, which enables China to get more hardware with much less spending than America.
For example, a 071 landing platform dock (LPD) costs China only US$300 million while an American San Antonio-class LPD of similar size and functions costs more than US$1.2 billion.
Who will win the arms race? The answer is quite clear.
A NEW ERA OF ENMITY BETWEEN CHINA AND AMERICA
Posted: February 7, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: America, Chan Kai Yee, China, Obama, strategic shift, Sun Tzu, Tiananmen's Tremendous Achievements Leave a comment »I was surprised that America was shocked by China’s veto to the proposed UN Security Council decision on Syria. Obviously, American leaders lack the vision to foresee that President Obama’s new strategy of regarding China and Iran as America’s two priorities has reduced almost to zero China’s willingness to cooperate with America.
For America Iran’s nuclear issue is an urgent one requiring immediate actions while China’s rise is a long-term issue. President Obama’s new strategy has caused America’s long-term potential enemy to unite with its imminent enemy.
How foolish!
China has great interest in Libya. It had to withdraw over 50,000 people from Libya when Libya was in trouble. In spite of that, it refrained from vetoing UN Security Council decision on Libya because it wanted to maintain good relations with the United States.
China does not have much interest in Syria, but Russia has. Russia is now much weaker than its predecessor the Soviet Union and is not able to confront America alone. President Obama’s new strategy has driven China to Russian side and made China Russia’s ally in dealing with America.
According to Hong Kong media, Russian and China have recently resumed their talks on Su 35 airplanes. Previously the talks are about China’s purchase of the planes but now China wants Russia to transfer intellectual property so as to produce Su 35 jointly with Russia. Su 35 is able to counter America’s F 35, but America still has quite a few problems in developing its F 35. China has lots of financial resources while Russia and China both have technological resources. If combined, the two will be in the best position to develop advanced weapons.
According to President Obama, America will reduce its military spending. Under such circumstances, is he not stupid in arousing China to begin its arms race with America by his recent strategic switch?
Chinese people now often learn from Chinese media that American is encircling China by stationing troops in Australia and the Philippines, conducting joint military drills with China’s border dispute opponents, etc. Has American media ever mentioned encirclement of America by China? Never, encircling America? Ridiculous!
However, China will be able to encircle America economically if it succeeds in obtaining economic leadership in Africa and establishing an Asian community with ASEAN, Japan, South Korea, India and Central Asian countries. China’s huge growing market will be the greatest attraction. America, on the other hand, does not even have a plan to obtain economic leadership in that region.
Which country will succeed?
The country with wise leader assisted by talented intellectuals with moral integrity will succeed? I have not seen wise leader with talented assistants now in America, but I know the emergence of wise leaders assisted by talented assistants with moral integrity in China now, their coup to seize power in the Party and state and their success in making China prosperous. What I know is revealed in my book “Tiananmen’s Tremendous Achievements: The Silent Peaceful Coup D’état In China…”
OBAMA HELPING CHINA SURPASS AMERICA
Posted: January 31, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: America, China, cultural leadership, Obama, soft power, South China Sea, the Philippines, world leadership Leave a comment »In my post “China Establishing While USA Losing World Leadership” yesterday, I point out that President Obama’s plan to bring back manufacturing and jobs and increase export will cause America to lose world leadership. It in fact helps China to grab world leadership from America because China is gaining popularity now in getting richer and helping other countries to become rich by providing investment and job opportunities and expanding its market for imports. However, faced with serious unemployment, America has no alternative.
America remains world leader in military strength, but it is helping China to catch up as it makes China step up its military build-up by announcement of its intention to be involved in South China Sea disputes. China will, therefore, substantially increase its military spending while America is reducing its military budget. Chinese military budget appears to be much smaller than America’s, but China can assign military research and development projects to its state-owned enterprises (SOEs) without government funding as such projects may also be useful for civil purposes. Even if they are solely for military purpose, China can fund the projects by reducing the profit that state-owned enterprises have to deliver to the government. That will certainly not be reflected in its military budget.
In 2011, Chinese SOEs’ profit totals US$357 billion, of which 10% to 15%, i.e. US$35.7 to US$53.5 billion shall be delivered to the government, quite a substantial amount compared with China’s military budget of US$77.95 billion.
Moreover, Chinese government may also order state-owned enterprises to provide it with military hardware at a very low price without any profit, which enables China to get more hardware with much less spending than America.
For example, a 071 landing platform dock (LPD) costs China only US$300 million while an America San Antonio-class LPD of similar size and functions costs more than US$1.2 billion.
There are widespread malpractices of counterfeiting, and pirating of American software similar to rampant corruption difficult to eliminate due to involvement of local vested interest. Foreign, especially American pressure has helped Chinese central government and quite a few enterprises that produce quality goods realize the importance of developing China’ own brands, patents and software and make them popular not only in China but also the world over. Over the past two years, China has conducted lots of raids to put an end to such malpractices in order to facilitate first of all development of China’s own intellectual property.
America movies and music spread American values of democracy, human rights, etc. The Chinese government certainly wants to reduce their influence as much as possible, but they are popular and difficult to be censured unless the government has well justified reason. America, however, is helping China reduce their influence by pressuring China to put an end to pirating and thus make them less affordable.
Ambitious to be world leader, China is making much investment to spread its TV and radio broadcasting and setting up Confucius Institutes the world over. The Chinese Communist Party regards its movies and music as propaganda for its values and is willing to promote them at great costs. China has encouraged its skillful film makers to produce films such as “Hero” and “The Flowers of War” that not only serve its propaganda purpose but also earn foreign exchange.
“Hero” especially praises one of China’s two worst tyrants for his achievement of unification of China to justify the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s praise of Mao Zedong’s similar achievement and the legitimacy of its rule. Due to the film’s artistic success, people outside China paid to be brainwashed.
Last October, CCP Central Committee held its sixth session to adopt a decision to boost China’s soft power and maintain cultural security following China’s ongoing economic boom. It called on Chinese people to carry out the strategy of opening up international cultural market and continuously enhance the influence of Chinese culture in the world. China wants not only economic and military but also cultural leadership.
Moreover, America helps China by pressuring it to turn Renminbi into a freely convertible currency, but does not see the threat to US dollar’s position as an international currency. China is making efforts to turn Renminbi into the currency for settlement in its trade with some Asian and African countries. If China succeeds in establishing a greater Asian community, like Euro, Renminbi, if freely convertible, may become the major currency for the community.
CHINA ESTABLISHING WHILE USA LOSING WORLD LEADERSHIP
Posted: January 30, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: America, China, Obama, world leadership Leave a comment »Due to China’s strategic shift, it is narrowing rich-poor gap, improving its people’s living standards and expanding its domestic markets and needs natural resources and cheap labor. Its huge foreign exchange reserve and its people’s huge savings need to be invested elsewhere. Africa and quite a few ASEAN countries have rich natural resources and need Chinese investment and market to provide job opportunities for their cheap labor.
There are now over 2,000 enterprises with US$40 billion Chinese investment in Africa and China became Africa’s biggest trading partner in 2009 and its trade with Africa rose more than 20% in 2010. For better relations, Chinese government spent US$200 million to build the headquarters of the African Union. Its No. 4 leader Jia Qinglin attended African Union’s recent summit and promised to provide African Union with US$95 million funds over the next three years.
China cannot establish and maintain its leadership in Africa if its relations with Africa are not mutually beneficial. There have already been complaints about trade imbalance. In order to enable both parties to be winners, China’s deputy commerce minister Gao Hucheng said that China would increase its investments in African manufacturing and transfer technology and management skills to “change from made-in-China to made-in-Africa”.
Similarly, in Southeast Asia, Chinese is one of the leading trading partners and investors in quite a few countries and its labor-intensive industry is moving to Cambodia and other countries with cheap labor. If China adopts a policy similar to what it plans to adopt in Africa, China’s leadership in Southeast Asia is ensured.
Even the EU wants Chinese funds now.
In short, China is establishing its leadership in the world by providing funds, job opportunities and a growing huge market while making money from the investment and obtaining cheap goods for its people.
What about America?
In his recent State of the Union address, President Obama gives priority to bringing manufacturing and jobs back to America. He perhaps means bringing jobs back from China, but China is moving enterprises that require cheap labor to African and South East Asia. By bringing back jobs, America will reduce the job opportunities created by China in developing countries.
Moreover, while China is providing its expanding huge market for developing countries, President Obama plans to make “it easier for American businesses to sell products all over the world.” He said he would “go anywhere in the world to open new markets for America products.” Certainly, demand for the products of those countries will decrease.
President Obama’s policies are certainly good for America, but who in the world will follow his leadership to have their job opportunities and domestic and export market shares reduced?
Chan Kai Yee is the author of “Tiananmen’s Tremendous Achievements: The Silent Peaceful Coup D’état In China…”.
CHINA STEPS UP ITS NAVY BUILDUP
Posted: January 29, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: America, China, Obama, strategic shift, Sun Tzu, the Philippines 2 Comments »In addition to the busy testing of its aircraft carrier, trial operation of its satellite GPS system, and launching of its third 071 landing platform dock (LPD) in September 2011, China recently launched its fourth 071 LPD during its Chinese Lunar New Year Festival according to Hong Kong’s “Mingpao” newspaper.
071 LPD is a 20,000-ton amphibious transport dock similar to the US-built San Antonio-class LPD. With a range of 6,000 nmi (11,000 km) and a capacity to carry 500-800 troops, 15-20 armored vehicles and 6 helicopters, it will be quite useful if China has to solve South China Sea disputes by force.
In July 2010, China reacted angrily at statements concerning South China Sea disputes by US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton during an Asean security gathering. It began to quicken the development of its navy. Since it decided to counter military threat with military strength, it responded to President Obama’s high-profile announcement of America’s return to Asia last year with a Xinhua comment entitled “Constructive US role in Asia-Pacific welcome” and reiteration of its statement that China’s peaceful rise constitutes no threat at all to America.
“Sun Tzu” begins its teachings by saying: “The art of war is an art of deception. Hence, one shall make his enemy believe that he is unable to fight when he is able to and that he has no desire to fight when he is going to.” Having followed the teachings in “Sun Tzu” for over 2,000 years, China believes that America’s activities in providing arms to and holding joint military drills with China’s border dispute opponents are aimed at containing China and that America’s statements to the contrary are but deception.
China launched its first 071 LPD in December 2006 and its second 071 LPD 4 years later in November 2010, but it launched the third 10 months later and the fourth five months after the third. Why was the haste, especially the haste in launching one during the Chinese Lunar New Year Festival? Because China is conducting an arms race with America in earnest. It now wants to catch up with and surpass America in military strength as soon as possible because it believes that America wants to bully it.
There is something quite similar between the China now and the Germany after World War I. German people suffered greatly when German economy collapsed due to the heavy indemnity imposed on it after it lost World War I. Chinese people suffered greatly when Britain forced it to accept import of opium after China was defeated by Britain. The misery lasted for over a century afterwards as China was bullied by various foreign powers and finally invaded by Japan for eight years. Hitler became popular as German people wanted revenge, but Chinese people do not want revenge. They want to put an end to its century-long history of being bullied by foreign powers.
Does America want to bully China? Certainly not. America is uncertain whether China’s rise will be a threat to its security and interest and world peace or beneficial to the world. It switched its strategic priority to China merely for the purpose that it can adopt preemptive action in case China turns out to be a threat. However, this shows America’s dire lack of understanding of China.
First, America is ignorant of Chinese people’s sensitiveness to bully by any foreign power. Its deviation from its traditional attitude of avoiding being involved in border disputes between other countries gives Chinese people the impression that it is playing off China’s neighbors against China in order to profit from the border disputes. Chinese people have begun to regard America as their enemy.
Second, it lacks basic knowledge about Chinese history, which is a history of dynasties. Usually, a major dynasty remained prosperous for about one century after its establishment. The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) Dynasty has been established for only three decades since Hua Guofeng, the successor of Mao Dynasty, was dethroned; therefore, there will be at least several more decades of prosperity in the future for China. People kept predicting hard landing of Chinese economy, but it has never occurred because Chinese leader and his talented assistants with moral integrity are too wise and clever to allow it to occur.
People believe that it is safe to predict China’s tremendous growth cannot last for more that 30 years because Japan’s rapid growth lasted for only 30 years in the past. However the figure 30 has no magic force for China as China is an entirely different country.
My greatest worry is that a despot like Mao may be selected as a successor to the core of the collective leadership (paramount leader) in China’s current system of succession. When such a despot comes to power, he may exploit the enmity among Chinese people to confront America when China has grown stronger than America. Such confrontation may have disastrous consequence to China and the world but in China’s political system, no one can stop the despot.
Perhaps, America is ignorant about Sun Tzu’s art of deception and believes that China really welcomes America’s return to Asia to interfere in the border disputes. Perhaps, it does not believe that China will grow stronger than it. Perhaps, it is not aware of the enmity it has roused among Chinese people. Otherwise, it would not have declared its plan to reduce its military budget and give up its goal of being able to successfully fight two major regional wars when China is making every effort to surpass it in military strength.
In my article “China’s Greater Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere”, I mentioned China’s plan to establish an Asian community similar to the EU. I believe that the prospects of being benefited from China’s huge market will help China solve border disputes peacefully. If China adopts a win-win policy in dealing with potential members of the community, Asia may become the most prosperous region in the world.
With America’s economic power, before China has established its status as the centre of Asia, America may begin to establish an Asian-Pacific community consisting of all the potential members of the Asian community and other Pacific countries and regions. As China will also be benefited by the community, it may take an active part and become America’s mutually beneficial partner. Why does America not choose this alternative? Perhaps, due to America’s long experience of Cold War, it has got used to solving problems by force or military superiority.
Chan Kai Yee is the author of “Tiananmen’s Tremendous Achievements: The Silent Peaceful Coup D’état In China…”
OBAMA’S GENEROUS NEW YEAR GIFT TO CHINA
Posted: January 28, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: ASEAN, China, Obama, South China Sea, the Philippines 2 Comments »China knows well that its weapons are inferior now; therefore, its leaders, political scientists, well-known journalists, academics, etc. have the consensus that China needs two decades of peace. They believe that by 2030, its economy will be much bigger and its weapons will be superior to put an end to its century-long history of being bullied by other countries.
When border tension with the Philippines intensified last June and America began to be involved by planning a joint military exercise, under the threat of a possible military confrontation involving America, China conducted the first test of its aircraft carrier in a hurry when the boat had not yet been able to sail by its own engine.
Obama’s unprecedented participation in ASEAN summit meeting on November 11, 2011 and announcement of America’s return to Asia encouraged China’s neighbors to confront China in their South China Sea disputes with China. China was greatly worried and forced to step up its military buildup. It conducted the second and third tests of its aircraft carrier last November and December, put its own satellite GPS system into trial operation at the end of last month and declared its plan to launch 6 more satellites in 2012 to improve the system. According to a Taiwan military expert, missiles and bombs guided by that system will be much more accurate and Taiwan needs US help to destroy those satellites if it is attacked.
Unexpectedly, Obama gave China a generous New Year gift by his announcement of America’s new strategy. First, he will greatly reduce America’s military spending, which of course will affect the progress of America’s development of sophisticated weapons. China’s weaponry will catch up and surpass America’s within a shorter period of time. What good news for China!
Second, the priority Obama gives to containing China has raised Chinese people’s nationalist fever, which has always been high due to China’s history of being bullied by foreign powers for a century. It is now even easier for China to increase its military spending and its weapon development personnel have even greater incentive in their work.
Third, according to Obama’s new strategy, America has two priorities: China and Iran. Then, if America gives advanced weapons to China’s neighbors to counter China, China will give its best weapons to Iran. As American weapons are expensive, it has to give financial aids for the purchase but lacks the funds. However, Chinese weapons are cheap and affordable for Iran. China can give its best weapons to Iran as its weapons are being developed and what it has sold is not what it ultimately wants. On the other hand, as those neighbors of China lack political stability, have corrupt officials or may become China’s allies, America cannot sell its best weapons to them, but less advanced weapons are not attractive enough for them.
If luckily for China, there is indeed a war between America and Iran, China will have the opportunity to test its weapons and improve them in real battles while making money by the sales. It is hard to tell whether the war will really take place, but you can be sure that Obama’s new strategy has reduced to zero China’s willingness to cooperate with America in dealing with Iran.
The last but not the least, America will no longer strive to have the ability to successfully fight two major regional wars, which is a major deterrence to war because with such ability, America will not hesitate to fight a war to stop aggression. Without such deterrence, there will be greater risk of war for America as countries like Iran will be bolder to test America’s patience especially when America has already been fighting a war.
For China, it means that the time when America is already in a war is the best timing for China to fight a war to resolve border disputes as according to the new strategy, America will not be able to fight two major regional wars. This is especially attractive to China when America has given some of its most sophisticated war equipment to a border contender. China can make a quick maneuver like what it did in its war against India in the 1960s to defeat its enemy, occupy the islands under dispute and capture the sophisticated equipment. It will return the equipment later as it did in the 1960s, but it will have learnt all the secrets in the equipment.
As Obama’s strategic switch is widely regarded as “an attempt to counter China’s rising power”, China certainly cannot respond by expressing its thanks for such a generous gift. However China’s official Xinhua News Agency’s response entitled “Constructive US role in Asia-Pacific welcome” shows that it is hard for China not to betray its joy at the news.
Chinese leaders are wise in avoiding confrontation with America as such confrontation may have disastrous consequence not only for the two countries but also for the world. My greatest worry is that under current Chinese political system and with worship of Mao Zedong remaining hot in China, a despot like Mao may emerge when China grows into a superpower stronger than America. That despot’s ambition to force his ways on the world will bring catastrophes to the world.
President Gorge Bush Jr. fought a war in Iraq that America should not fight, wasted $800 billion and caused America’s financial difficulties now. President Obama has proved incompetent in dealing with America’s economic difficulties. I hope the next president will have the talents to make America prosperous so as to prove to Chinese people that democracy is the best political system in the world so that China will learn from America’s example and have democracy. Only when there is democracy in China can we be sure that there will be no confrontation between China and America.
Chan Kai Yee is the author of “Tiananmen’s Tremendous Achievements: The Silent Peaceful Coup D’état In China…”
Buy the Book from iUniverse