China: Conservatives’ Power Struggle with Reformists in Theory

In the expanded 2nd edition of my book Tiananmen’s Tremendous Achievements, I describe in details the commencement of the power struggle between refromists and conservatives by Hu Jintao’s omission of Mao Zedong Thought, Bo Xilai’s rise as the leader of the powerful conservative faction, his use of Maoist Chongqing model to oppose reformists’ further economic liberalization, his downfall due to the trick of the democracy and legal faction with the cooperation of a heavyweight of the Shanghai faction, Jiang Zemin’s decision to punish Bo harshly and Xi Jinping using Chinese dream to put an end to the power struggle.

If Xi had failed to put an end to the power struggle, China would have been a divided nation in which Xi would have been utterly unable to conduct his thorough economic reform.

The book also describes how Xi used Mao’s term of mass line to carry out his mass line campaign that is entirely different from Mao’s. Those are very long topics that the readers, if interested, can read the book.

What I have to point out is that the power struggle will remain until like Jiang Zemin, Xi has developed a theory accepted by the Party to justify his reform similar to Jiang’s Three Representatives that justify Jiang’s prusuit of capitalism and the recruitment of capitalists into the Party.

SCMP publishes a report on the debates in theory between Maoists and reformists that reflect the power struggle in the field of theory. I have to point out that it will be a vital struggle to smoothen the road of reform just as the debate at the beginning of Deng Xiaoping’s reform. Only when Deng’s doctrine of “practice is the only criterion of inspecting truth” prevailed over Hua Guofeng’s Maoist “two whatevers” (which advocate persisting in acting in accordance with Mao’s instructions) would Deng really be able to conduct his reform.

The following is the full text of the SCMP report:

Academic’s questions point to Communist Party divide over dogma

Party academics raise series of agenda-setting questions, reflecting differing internal views on how to merge ideology with economic reality

The Communist Party must bridge ideological divides that are driving a wedge between its factions, party analysts have said ahead of a key meeting this month.

Academics at the Central Party School have raised eight ideological questions, the answers to which they say will be crucial to the direction of the country’s development, according to a report by Shanghai Thinkers Forum, a theoretical journal run by the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences.

The article was also posted on the People’s Daily website.

The questions revolve around the need to maintain the traditional communist ideology as the party tries to establish a capitalist-style market economy.

The issues run from the contradictions between the tenets of socialism and market economics; to how to promote core socialist values; and the need to settle the theory of class struggle.

Question marks have also been raised over interpretations of Soviet-era Marxism, modern governance of state affairs, the role of market forces in resource distribution, the coexistence of Marxism and traditional Chinese culture, and the mechanics of a market economy under a centralised government.

The article comes as the party prepares for its fourth plenum in Beijing on October 20-23, a gathering expected to cover major political and ideological issues, including the rule of law and judicial reform.

The plenum will convene under the leadership of Xi Jinping who, in the two years since becoming general secretary, has launched both anti-corruption and ideological campaigns to “purify” the party to justify its sole rule of the world’s most populous nation.

The ideological debate is reflected in the wrangle that two leading party publications – Qiushi (Seeking Truth), the party’s theoretic journal, and the Study Times, a key product of the Central Party School – have engaged in over late leader chairman Mao Zedong’s theory of class struggle.

Analysts said this rising debate highlighted the ideological dilemma the party had struggled with since the mainland embarked on market reforms 35 years ago.

“This is a very interesting debate. At the core is the Communist Party’s difficulty in re-establishing its legitimacy as political and economic conditions change,” said Professor Zhiqun Zhu, director of the China Institute at Bucknell University in the United States.

Zhu said the debate reflected deep divisions among party officials and scholars, disputes that could widen the party’s internal gaps and create opposing political camps.

“It may also be conducive to redefining the party’s very identity in the 21st century and lead to the transformation of the party [into one] that will become more politically open and tolerant.”

Xigen Li, an associate professor at City University’s department of media and communication, added: “The issue of ideological correctness and … reality is always a dilemma, which is difficult to resolve under China’s current political system.”

Li said the dilemma and the debates over the ideological issues would continue and have the benefit of bringing the issues to the table for those in power to face seriously.

“While ideological emancipation is the final solution – and the dilemma will exist for some time – at least some compromise could be made to solve compelling issues in economic development rationally and efficiently,” Li said.

Source: Chan Kai Yee Tiananmen’s Tremendous Achievements Expanded 2nd Edition

Source: SCMP “Academic’s questions point to Communist Party divide over dogma”


23 Comments on “China: Conservatives’ Power Struggle with Reformists in Theory”

  1. I’m truly enjoying the design and layout of your blog. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes
    it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit more often.
    Did you hire out a developer to create your theme? Great work!


  2. What’s up friends, how is everything, and what you desire to
    say on the topic of this post, in my view its truly amazing designed for me.


  3. Your means of explaining all in this paragraph is in fact fastidious, every one be able to effortlessly be aware of it, Thanks a lot.


  4. I pay a quick visit everyday a few blogs and sites to read articles, except this blog presents
    feature based posts.


  5. Hi Dear, are you really visiting this site on a regular basis,
    if so then you will absolutely get nice knowledge.


  6. Having read this I thought it was very enlightening.
    I appreciate you taking the time and effort to put this information together.
    I once again find myself spending a significant
    amount of time both reading and leaving comments. But so what, it was
    still worth it!


  7. This text is invaluable. When can I find out more?


  8. Spot on with this write-up, I actually believe this amazing site needs a great deal more attention. I’ll probably be
    returning to see more, thanks for the advice!


  9. Hi there! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance
    from an established blog. Is it tough to set up your own blog?
    I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick.

    I’m thinking about making my own but I’m not sure where to
    begin. Do you have any tips or suggestions? Thank you


  10. Thanks , I’ve recently been looking for info about this topic for ages
    and yours is the best I’ve came upon so far. However, what concerning
    the bottom line? Are you positive in regards to the supply?


  11. Hello to all, since I am truly eager of reading this website’s post to be updated on a regular basis.
    It consists of good data.


  12. Very shortly this website will be famous among all blogging visitors,
    due to it’s good posts


  13. This post is genuinely a nice one it assists new web visitors, who are wishing in favor of blogging.


  14. certainly like your web-site but you have to take
    a look at the spelling on quite a few of your posts. A
    number of them are rife with spelling problems and I to find it very bothersome to inform the reality then again I will definitely come back again.


  15. Wonderful beat ! I would like to apprentice even as you
    amend your site, how can i subscribe for a weblog site?
    The account aided me a appropriate deal. I have been tiny bit familiar
    of this your broadcast provided vibrant transparent idea


  16. I’m gone to tell my little brother, that
    he should also pay a quick visit this weblog on regular basis to
    obtain updated from latest news.


  17. I like the helpful info you supply to your articles. I’ll bookmark your weblog
    and test once more right here frequently. I’m moderately certain I will be informed plenty of
    new stuff proper right here! Best of luck for the following!


  18. What’s up i am kavin, its my first time to commenting anywhere, when i read this post
    i thought i could also create comment due to this sensible paragraph.


  19. Thanks a lot for sharing this with all people you really recognise what you’re speaking about!
    Bookmarked. Please also seek advice from my web site =).

    We will have a link alternate agreement between us


  20. Hi there would you mind stating which blog platform you’re working with?

    I’m going to start my own blog soon but I’m having a tough time selecting between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your layout seems different then most blogs and
    I’m looking for something completely unique.
    P.S Apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!


  21. Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your
    post seem to be running off the screen in Internet explorer.
    I’m not sure if this is a format issue or
    something to do with web browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know.
    The design look great though! Hope you get the problem resolved soon. Thanks


  22. […] China: Conservatives’ Power Struggle with Reformists in Theory ( […]