China-Russian Alliance Intensified against the US


Chinese and Russian naval vessels participate in the Joint Sea-2014 naval drill outside Shanghai on the East China Sea, May 24, 2014. REUTERS/China Daily

Chinese and Russian naval vessels participate in the Joint Sea-2014 naval drill outside Shanghai on the East China Sea, May 24, 2014. REUTERS/China Daily

In my post “Details of China’s New Advanced J-11B Fighter Jet”, I give National Interest’s description of China’s advanced J-11B fighter jet in its article titled “China Stole This Fighter From Russia—and It’s Coming to the South China Sea” on July 24. The article first of all tells readers how China has stolen technology from Russia in modernizing its air force.

It begins with the following paragraphs:

The Shenyang J-11 is a Chinese copy of the excellent Russian Sukhoi Su-27 “Flanker” multirole fighter. In fact, it was at first an authorized copy—but Chinese ambitions to adapt it with locally produced technology transformed it into a reverse-engineered headache for Russian industry. In successive variants, the J-11 and the Flanker-derived J-15 and J-16 have been at the forefront of Chinese efforts to produce long-range fourth-generation fighters that can contest the seas around China—if only Chinese engineers can work out the kinks in their domestically produced jet engines.

Development

I’ve written before about the latest version of the Su-27, the Su-35, but let’s review the basics. The Flanker was a late Cold War design that in most respects served as a Russian counterpart to the F-15 Eagle: a “heavy,” but maneuverable, twin-engine multirole fighter that can fly at high speeds across long distances with a heavy missile or bomb load. The early Flanker can pull off even tighter maneuvers than the relatively agile F-15, and originally came with better short-range air-to-air missiles (the R-73); however, it lagged behind later F-15s in terms of sensors, though not nearly as much as its lighter stablemate, the MiG-29 Fulcrum.

All in all, this means the Su-27 was a top shelf fighter in the early nineties, when China became the first country outside of the former Soviet world to operate Flankers: thirty-eight Su-27SKs and forty Su-27UBK two-seat trainers acquired between 1992 and 2000, for between $30 and $40 million apiece. The Su-27SKs came with Russian R-27 and R-73 air-to-air missiles, but had little capability for advanced air-to-ground munitions—though China insisted the Flankers’ landing gear come strengthened so they could accommodate a heavier bomb load.

Post-Soviet Russia was then entering especially tough economic times—some of the Flanker payments were made in food in-kind!—and these sales were away to help keep the economy afloat. China, for its part, had recently lost access to the American and European defense markets following the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.

However, in 1995 the Chinese said they weren’t interested in buying more finished aircraft from Russia—but would pay for the license to assemble Su-27 kits in China. Russia agreed on the condition that the engines and avionics would still be made in Russia. The deal was struck: two hundred Chinese-made aircraft—now designated J-11s—for $2.5 billion. So far, so legal.

China already had a tradition of producing domestic copies of Soviet tanks and aircraft dating back to the late fifties, when a falling out with the Soviet Union cut it off from foreign arms supplier. Now Russia had figured out a way to get paid for the copies!

Then a funny thing happened: in 2004, having already assembled one hundred aircraft, the Chinese cancelled the remainder of the contract, claiming the Su-27 no longer met their needs—true, in that they wanted fighters with precision-guided munition capabilities.

However, three years later China revealed that Shenyang Aircraft Corporation was producing the J-11B—without any Russian involvement. Though 90 percent of the J-11’s components were indigenously made, the airframe was nearly identical. Beijing had ducked out of paying for the whole contract and reverse-engineered the Flanker. The Russian arms industry was very upset, and growled about intellectual-copyright litigation for several years—but with China accounting for 40 percent of Russian military sales for the first eight years of the century, Russian manufacturers appear not to have retaliated in the end.

Russia did want to punish China for stealing its technology. Russian military industrial circle refused to sell China Russia’s advanced weapons including Su-35 fighter jet and S-400 air defense system. However, I said in my post on March 31, 2013 titled “Sino-Russian Arms Deals Are Political for Cold War Partnership”:

There have been reports that Russian military worries that providing China advanced weapons may threaten Russian security while Russian military industry circle worries that China may steal Russian technology by reverse engineering, but Russian President Putin insists that there should be the arms deals. Why? For the sake of Sino-Russian Cold War partnership against the US.

Now, the weapon trade and joint ventures for production of large aircrafts and helicopters between Russia and China have been proceeding smoothly. It proves that Russia has been financially compensated for the theft as China also attaches great importance to its de facto alliance with Russia.

Previously China sent its navy to the Mediterranean to conduct joint drill with Russia to support Russia’s moves against the US in Europe. Now, Reuters says in its report “China says to hold drills with Russia in South China Sea” today, that Russia is to send its navy to the South China Sea to conduct joint military drill with China to support China’s confrontation with the US.

All such military drills including those carried out by the US in the areas near China are routinely claimed to be not directed at third parties.

Who believes that?

Now, if either of Russia or China is attacked by the US, the other will lender help as it will be greatly weakened without its ally.

Comment by Chan Kai Yee on National Interest’s article and Reuters’ report, which can respectively viewed at http://nationalinterest.org/feature/china-stole-fighter-russia%E2%80%94-its-coming-the-south-china-sea-17087 and http://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-china-drills-idUSKCN1080O8.

Advertisements

6 Comments on “China-Russian Alliance Intensified against the US”

  1. advantec333 says:

    The Chinese jet is just undergoing more testing it is already according to the tests way better than any American engines====WS-13 , WS-15 and WS-20 . This is another area along with subs that China keeps a lot of secrecy.

    On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Tiananmens Tremendous Achievements wrote:

    > chankaiyee2 posted: ” In my post “Details of China’s New Advanced J-11B > Fighter Jet”, I give National Interest’s description of China’s advanced > J-11B fighter jet in its article titled “China Stole This Fighter From > Russia—and It’s Coming to the South China Sea” on July 24″ >

    Like

  2. Joseph says:

    So what’s wrong with this National Interest’s guys? They clearly alleged that China ‘stole’ this fighter from Russia. So why Russia as the allegedly victim of theft did not even complain? As the fighter did not even belong to the American, what was the base of their accusation? If the National Interest could not get even this one right, what to be saidnabout the rest of their articles? The lack of Russian complaint has clearly indicated the fighters changed hand legally. As I recall, wasn’t it the American who were obsessed of stealing Russian fighter jets? The American put bounties for Soviet and Russian defector pilots who brought along their fighter jets. They even made a couple of movies about successful theft of Russian fighters. Notably Firefox, where Clint Eastwood ‘successfully’ stole Russian prototype fighter. On the TV series JAG, the protagonists had to steal a Russian Su-27 with difficulties when they could just simply ‘buy’ it. Is it because of cowboy things? Stealing cows is after all one of cowboy expertise.

    Like

    • Simon says:

      I can tell the author of the National Interest piece is a fan of the Clint Eastwood film “Firefox”.

      China want to build their own Su 27 because the Russian version was not good enough. The Chinese kept the airframe and engine but stripped out everything, the avionics and weapons and made it better. When buying foreign fighter planes you need to keep on importiing parts to maintain it and the country you bought the aircraft from can maintain political leverage over you so by copying and building a better version yourself you are your own master. Makes perfect sense.

      Like

  3. Steve says:

    Both have reciprocated their military alliances by inviting each other’s participation of Naval Drills
    in the Mediterranean and now the SCS. However, Russia and China should ‘escalate’ their intensification of military alliances by landing fighter planes on those engineered islands and docking of Russian and Chinese warships.

    And to finish off the military and naval drills, play a game of volley ball and enjoy barbecue on those SCS islands under the Sun. This is mouth watering and intense jealousy on those ‘evil faces’ of USA, Japan, PH – Ali Baba thieves of the SCS and ESC.

    Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s