How Do America and China’s Huge New Warships Stack Up?

US new large stealth warship Zumwalt

US new large stealth warship Zumwalt. War Is Boring photo

Chinese military fan's drawing of China's new Type 055 warship under construction

Chinese military fan’s drawing of China’s new Type 055 warship under construction

‘Zumwalt’ versus Type 055


On Oct. 15, 2016 in Baltimore on the U.S. East Coast, the U.S. Navy commissioned the guided-missile destroyer USS Zumwalt into service following a protracted and costly development.

Six hundred feet long and displacing 14,500 tons, Zumwalt — the first of three stealthy land-attack destroyers — is America’s largest surface combatant in generations.

But she’s not alone in her weight class. While the Americans were celebrating Zumwalt’s entry into service, on the other side of the world at a shipyard in Shanghai, the Chinese navy was hard at work on its own 14,000-ton-displacement surface warship.

The Type 055 just began major construction and probably won’t enter service before 2018. But when she does, she could be the biggest and most powerful surface warship in Asia.

It’s unclear exactly what the Type 055 will do, but indications are that she’ll function as the main air-defense escort for China’s new domestically-built aircraft carrier, currently under construction at Dalian in northern China.

Consider the Type 055’s superstructure facets, apparently meant to support radar emitters similar to the SPY-1 emitters that are part of the U.S. Navy’s Aegis air-defense system. U.S. Navy flattops never go anywhere without at least one Aegis-equipped cruiser and several Aegis destroyers as escorts. Zumwalt, notably, is the first new major American surface combatant class in 30 years not to have Aegis.

The Type 055 likely won’t be a direct competitor of Zumwalt. Rather than integrating Zumwalt and her two sisters into carrier battle groups, the U.S. Navy will probably deploy the giant destroyers on solo cruises near land in order to take advantage of the vessels’ radar-evading hull-form and their twin, 155-millimeter guns, which can fire projectiles a distance of at least 80 miles in order to support amphibious landings and special operations.

The apparent differences between the Type 055 and the Zumwalt class are stark.

The Type 055 boasts a fairly traditional hull-form and superstructure, with only modest attempts to reduce radar-signature by way of an enclosed forward deck, an angular front superstructure and an enclosed main mast.

By contrast, Zumwalt is stealthy from the keel up, with a distinctive downward-sloping “tumblehome” hull and fully enclosed sensors and gun turrets. Arguably, Zumwalt and her sisters have greater need of stealth, as they could sail alone and close to enemy shores.

Assuming the Type 055 is indeed primarily an air-defense ship, she could travel in close company with a carrier, other escort vessels and even logistics ships, none of which are particularly stealthy. Building stealth into the Type 055 would represent an inefficient use of resources — assuming China’s naval architects are even capable of designing a ship as stealthy as Zumwalt is.

The Type 055 reportedly boasts 128 vertical launch cells for anti-air missiles and other munitions — six cells more than the U.S. Navy’s own most heavily-armed surface warships, the venerable Ticonderoga-class cruisers.

Zumwalt carries just 80 cells. These are arrayed along the edges of Zumwalt’s hull — the idea being that missile cells can also function as “armor,” partially absorbing the force of a missile or gun hit. The Type 055 apparently carries her own missiles in centrally-installed clusters, like the Ticonderogas and most other warships do.

Zumwalt’s designers traded missile capacity for durability. The Type 055’s originators stuck to traditional design principles, maximizing firepower at the cost of damage-resistance.

In many ways, the Type 055 is evolutionary rather than revolutionary. Largely conventional in form and function, the Type 055’s major innovation is, simply put, her size.

Zumwalt, on the other hand, pushes the boundaries of warship-design and could potentially open up new operational concepts. Not since the age of the battleship have navies deployed large warships close to enemy shores for the purposes of bombarding targets on land. Radars and guided missiles made the mission too dangerous for today’s flimsy, easy-to-detect surface combatants.

The Type 055 will probably do for China what the Aegis cruisers and destroyers — nearly 100 of them — are already doing for the United States. That is, protecting the carriers. Zumwalt, however, could make near-shore fire support possible again — a feat the Type 055 surely can’t duplicate.

It could turn out that sheer size is the only meaningful characteristic America and China’s respective 14,000-ton surface warships have in common.

Source: WAR IS BORING “How Do America and China’s Huge New Warships Stack Up?”

Note: This is WAR IS BORING’s article I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean that I agree or disagree with the article’s views.

Chan Kai Yee’s comment: The two warships are entirely incomparable as they are built for entirely different strategic goals. 055 is mainly a missile and air defense Aegis warship for an aircraft carrier while Zumwalt is a ground attack one.

According to an article by POP3 of Chinese military forum carried on on October 15, a Type 055 warship costs $880 million (6 billion yuan converted at the rate of 6.817 yuan a dollar), a fraction of Zumwalt’s $4.4 billion. Such stark cost difference makes them incomparable even if they are built for the same strategic goal.

Moreover, as China does not want to invade any other country, it has no need for any warship like Zumwalt. If it wants to conduct ground attack at Taiwan for reunification, long-range rocket artillery provides much greater fire power with much less costs. Zumwalt’s ammo cost $800,000 per round, which only US military can afford!

Only grown-up military boys of the richest country the US can afford playing with such expensive toys.

The Zumwalt is but a toy. Why? It will be detected as soon as it fires its guns and be locked on by lots of missiles and bombs from its enemy. What is the use of its top stealth capabilities? For the rich boys to boast!

Perhaps, it has very strong armor that makes it able to resist all the missiles and bombs. If so, why does it need its top stealth capabilities in the first place?


4 Comments on “How Do America and China’s Huge New Warships Stack Up?”

  1. Steve says:

    Don’t think these Zumwalts can get anywhere close to Russian and Chinese shores. China’s 022 Houbei stealth missile boats are equipped with superior stealth coating will scare the crap out of these overrated US boats. Looks impressive, but is it for real.? No…China’s Houbei 022 stealth boats can fire the YJ83 anti ship missiles with a beyond visual range hitting several targets within 150km. If these Zumwalts can only fire projectiles around 80km to protect the amphibious landings and special US operations, my question, who will protect these Zumwaltdisneys, when China’s Houbei 022 stealth missile boats can fire the YJ83 anti ship beyond visual range at 150km.?


  2. Fre Okin says:

    Zumwalt destroyer is a Fraud pulled on American taxpayers. In theory it can creep up close to attack China or Russia. However Chinese coastline and airspace above will be monitored 24/7 during period of high tension. Spies everywhere, Chinese thousands of commercial boats, ships serve as eyes and ears for the Chinese military. Zumwalt should never make a port call to Singapore. Spies will tip off her presence and Chinese long duration drones and even the Yuanmen aerostat will be waiting for her from above. Due to her massive size, her infra red emission will give away her position uncovered by drones and aerostats. Further, Haiyan UUV’s will be sniffing around the Chinese coastlines way before Zumwalt arrive. Her stealth will be uncovered way before she come close to firing position.


  3. Simon says:

    As a waning superpower the Americans are now immitating Nazi Germany in the last days of WW2. To trump up moral Germany built a stealthy looking super tank the size of a house and calls it the Maus or mouse. It cost so much to build and even if put into operation it would be a sitting target it never manage to come off the assembly line. The Zumwait is America’s answer to the Maus built as a psychological moral booster and to suck up taxpaers money by big defenec companies.


  4. johnleecan says:

    Yes. I give 5 stars to Mr. Chan Kai Yee.