Trump’s America First Hurts Japan, but Benefits China


U.S. President Donald Trump (C), flanked by Gary Masino (L) of the Sheet Metal Workers Union and Telma Mata (R) of the Heat and Frost Insulators Allied Workers Local 24, holds a roundtable meeting with labor leaders at the White House in Washington, U.S. January 23, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

U.S. President Donald Trump (C), flanked by Gary Masino (L) of the Sheet Metal Workers Union and Telma Mata (R) of the Heat and Frost Insulators Allied Workers Local 24, holds a roundtable meeting with labor leaders at the White House in Washington, U.S. January 23, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Reuters says in its report “Trump pulls U.S. out of Pacific trade deal, loosening Asia ties” today that US new president Trump took prompt action to kill TPP that Japanese Prime Minister Abe relies on for his efforts to reinvigorate Japan’s economy and containing China.

Trump is indeed a man of quick actions so that when Trump has taken real measures to stimulate US manufacturing, Japanese manufacturing will be the first to suffer as US industrial goods are to be sold in mostly the same market for Japanese goods and the US is well capable of competing with Japan with its most advanced technology in the world.

The competition between the US and Japan will be a more interesting trade war for us to watch. It will be a war that will benefit others by providing them with better goods resulted from the competition.

China has to work hard to join the competition now as it lags behind the two in technology, but the competition will enable Chinese President Xi Jinping to carry out his innovation- and creation-geared reform more smoothly as China has to join the competition for market share in not only international market but also Chinese market for high tech goods as China advocates free trade and has to allow US and Japanese goods entry of its huge market.

As a free-trade advocator, there are no prospects of trade war between China and the US as Trump’s initiatives to take jobs back to the US will only cause American manufacturers to move their investment back to the US, leaving Chinese investment to take over. US manufacturing enterprises in China taken over by Chinese investment will continue to sell goods to the US and improve their technology to join the competition. China will only be benefited from Trump’s moves.

Comment by Chan Kai Yee on Reuters’ report, full text of which is reblogged below:

Trump pulls U.S. out of Pacific trade deal, loosening Asia ties

By Steve Holland and Ayesha Rascoe | WASHINGTON

U.S. President Donald Trump formally withdrew the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal on Monday, distancing America from its Asian allies, as China’s influence in the region rises.

Fulfilling a campaign pledge to end American involvement in the 2015 pact, Trump signed an executive order in the Oval Office pulling the United States out of the 12-nation TPP.

Trump, who wants to boost U.S. manufacturing, said he would seek one-on-one trade deals with countries that would allow the United States to quickly terminate them in 30 days “if somebody misbehaves.”

“We’re going to stop the ridiculous trade deals that have taken everybody out of our country and taken companies out of our country,” the Republican president said as he met with union leaders in the White House’s Roosevelt Room.

The TPP accord, backed heavily by U.S. business, was negotiated by former Democratic President Barack Obama’s administration but never approved by Congress. It had been the main economic pillar of the Obama administration’s “pivot” to the Asia-Pacific region to counter China.

Trump has sparked worries in Japan and elsewhere in the Asia-Pacific with his opposition to the TPP and his campaign demands for U.S. allies to pay more for their security.

But his trade stance mirrors a growing feeling among Americans that international trade deals have hurt the U.S. job market. Republicans have long held the view that free trade is a must, but that mood has been changing.

“It’s going to be very difficult to fight that fight,” said Lanhee Chen, a Hoover Institution fellow who was domestic policy adviser to 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney. “Trump is reflecting a trend that has been apparent for many years.”

Harry Kazianis, Director of Defense Studies at the Center for the National Interest think tank in Washington, said Trump must now find an alternative way to reassure allies in Asia.

“This could include multiple bilateral trade agreements. Japan, Taiwan and Vietnam should be approached first as they are key to any new Asia strategy that President Trump will enact,” he said.

Trump is also working to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement to provide more favorable terms to the United States, telling reporters he would meet leaders of NAFTA partners Mexico and Canada to get the process started.

BUSINESS LEADERS

The new president also met with a dozen American manufacturers at the White House on Monday, pledging to slash regulations and cut corporate taxes – but warning them he would take action on trade deals he felt were unfair.

Trump, who took office on Friday, has promised to bring factories back to the United States – an issue he said helped him win the Nov. 8 election. He has not hesitated to call out by name companies that he thinks should bring outsourced production back home.

He said those businesses that choose to move plants outside the country would pay a price. “We are going to be imposing a very major border tax on the product when it comes in,” Trump said.

He asked the group of chief executives from companies including Ford Motor Co , Dell Technologies Inc, Tesla Motors Inc and others to make recommendations in 30 days to stimulate manufacturing, Dow Chemical Co Chief Executive Officer Andrew Liveris told reporters.

Liveris said the CEOs discussed the border tax “quite a bit” with Trump, explaining “the sorts of industry that might be helped or hurt by that.”

“Look: I would take the president at his word here. He’s not going to do anything to harm competitiveness,” Liveris said. “He’s going to actually make us all more competitive.”

At part of the meeting observed by reporters, Trump provided no details on how the border tax would work.

The U.S. dollar fell to a seven-week low against a basket of other major world currencies on Monday, and global stock markets were shaky amid investor concerns about Trump’s protectionist rhetoric.

“A company that wants to fire all of its people in the United States, and build some factory someplace else, and then thinks that that product is going to just flow across the border into the United States – that’s not going to happen,” he said.

CUT TAXES AND REGULATIONS

The president told the CEOs he would like to cut corporate taxes to the 15 percent to 20 percent range, down from current statutory levels of 35 percent – a pledge that will require cooperation from the Republican-led U.S. Congress.

But he said business leaders have told him that reducing regulations is even more important.

“We think we can cut regulations by 75 percent. Maybe more,” Trump told business leaders.

“When you want to expand your plant, or when Mark wants to come in and build a big massive plant, or when Dell wants to come in and do something monstrous and special – you’re going to have your approvals really fast,” Trump said, referring to Mark Fields, CEO of Ford, who sat around the boardroom-style table in the Roosevelt Room.

Fields said he was encouraged by the tone of the meeting.

“I know I come out with a lot of confidence that the president is very, very serious on making sure that the United States economy is going to be strong and have policies – tax, regulatory or trade – to drive that,” he said.

Trump told the executives that companies were welcome to negotiate with governors to move production between states.

Trump was scheduled to hold a meeting later on Monday with labor leaders and U.S. workers, the White House said.

(Additional reporting by David Brunnstrom, Doina Chiacu, Susan Heavey, Ayesha Rascoe and David Shepardson; Editing by Frances Kerry, Alistair Bell and Jonathan Oatis)

Note: This is Reuters report I reblog here for readers’ information. It does not mean that I agree or disagree with the report’ views.

Advertisements

5 Comments on “Trump’s America First Hurts Japan, but Benefits China”

  1. Thank you for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do a little research about this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I think I learned more from this post. I’m very glad to see such great info being shared freely out there.

    Like

  2. Steve says:

    The only smart possible way for US companies to compete with China is to remain in China. All the infrastructures are already in place. Chinese entrepreneurs will be happy to take over established US manufacturing enterprises and compete against the US. It will take the US manufacturing enterprises at least a couple of years to re-establish bases, whilst China’s takeover US enterprises will acquire new markets, lesser competition. The US, is in fact losing ground in Africa, LatAM and Mexico to China’s investment portfolios. China continues to weave it’s portfolio web around the world, that is commercially first then economically by its international acquisitions as well as diplomatically and militarily.

    As reported, in the G2 – with China on the offence and the US on the retreat. This is a reality. What Trump is advocating now is trying to row his boat faster than the tsunami. America is definitely a declining power. Trump is instigating a competitive trade war, but lacks competitive edge against China.

    Like

  3. valiant says:

    china should stop selling rare earth minerals and other very important items that us industry needs badly and doesnt produce.

    Like

  4. Simon says:

    What really does not make sense is Trump’s regime saying they are trying to prevent China access to SCS islands which will almost certainly means war, and pulling out of economic partnership with their East Asian allies. You don’t commit to having a stronger military present there that involve increase spending if you reduce eonomic interest in the region. If you have reduce economic interests your allies in East Asia will be less committed to pay you for your military commitments.
    Trump has already threaten to end Nato saying it cost America too much money while other countries in the alliance don’t foot the bill. Then it make no sense to increase spending by committing its military to contain China when America pulls out of economic partnership in East Asia.

    Like