The Secret Way China and Russia Would Crush America in a War


Dave Majumdar

August 23, 2017

China is on the verge of fielding an operational anti-satellite weapon. Meanwhile, both great powers are working on developing directed energy weapons to counter American satellites. “Ten years after China intercepted one of its own satellites in low-Earth orbit, its ground-launched ASAT missiles might be nearing operational service within the PLA [People’s Liberation Army],” Coats stated. “Both countries are advancing directed energy weapons technologies for the purpose of fielding ASAT systems that could blind or damage sensitive space-based optical sensors. Russia is developing an airborne laser weapon for use against US satellites.”

Russia and China are actively pursuing new weapons and capabilities to counter America’s dominance of space according a U.S. Intelligence Community assessment. Indeed, both nations are considering the development of weapons that could attack U.S. satellites and other space-based assets in orbit.

“We assess that Russia and China perceive a need to offset any U.S. military advantage derived from military, civil, or commercial space systems and are increasingly considering attacks against satellite systems as part of their future warfare doctrine,” reads congressional testimony from Daniel Coats, director of National Intelligence on May 11. “Both will continue to pursue a full range of anti- satellite (ASAT) weapons as a means to reduce U.S. military effectiveness.”

The two great powers—which seek to offset America’s advantages in that domain—are continuing the development of such capabilities despite public statements that would curtain an arms race in space. “Russia and China remain committed to developing capabilities to challenge perceived adversaries in space, especially the United States, while publicly and diplomatically promoting nonweaponization of space and ‘no first placement’ of weapons in space,” Coats stated. “Such commitment continues despite ongoing US and allied diplomatic efforts to dissuade expansion of threats to the peaceful use of space, including international engagements through the U.N.”

Most attacks against U.S. space assets are likely to be non-kinetic, focusing on electronic attacks and cyber-warfare. “Development will very likely focus on jamming capabilities against dedicated military satellite communications (SATCOM), Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imaging satellites, and enhanced capabilities against Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), such as the US Global Positioning System (GPS),” Coats’ testimony reads. “Blending of EW [electronic warfare] and cyber-attack capabilities will likely expand in pursuit of sophisticated means to deny and degrade information networks. Chinese researchers have discussed methods to enhance robust jamming capabilities with new systems to jam commonly used frequencies. Russia intends to modernize its EW forces and field a new generation of EW weapons by 2020.”

However, when electronic warfare and cyber-weapons fail to achieve their desired objectives, the Russian and Chinese are prepared to use kinetic force to physically destroy American space assets. “Some new Russian and Chinese ASAT weapons, including destructive systems, will probably complete development in the next several years,” Coats stated. “Russian military strategists likely view counterspace weapons as an integral part of broader aerospace defense rearmament and are very likely pursuing a diverse suite of capabilities to affect satellites in all orbital regimes.”

But it’s not just the Russian military; policymakers in Moscow are also promoting anti-satellite weapons in the view of the U.S. intelligence community. “Russian lawmakers have promoted military pursuit of ASAT missiles to strike low-Earth orbiting satellites, and Russia is testing such a weapon for eventual deployment,” Coats stated. “A Russian official also acknowledged development of an aircraft-launched missile capable of destroying satellites in low-Earth orbit.”

On the other side of the world, China is on the verge of fielding an operational anti-satellite weapon. Meanwhile, both great powers are working on developing directed energy weapons to counter American satellites. “Ten years after China intercepted one of its own satellites in low-Earth orbit, its ground-launched ASAT missiles might be nearing operational service within the PLA [People’s Liberation Army],” Coats stated. “Both countries are advancing directed energy weapons technologies for the purpose of fielding ASAT systems that could blind or damage sensitive space-based optical sensors. Russia is developing an airborne laser weapon for use against US satellites.”

Additionally, both nations are developing satellites that can either tamper with other space assets or if necessary collide with and destroy an enemy orbital vehicle. “Russia and China continue to conduct sophisticated on-orbit satellite activities, such as rendezvous and proximity operations, at least some of which are likely intended to test dual-use technologies with inherent counterspace functionality,” Coats stated. “For instance, space robotic technology research for satellite servicing and debris-removal might be used to damage satellites. Such missions will pose a particular challenge in the future, complicating the U.S. ability to characterize the space environment, decipher intent of space activity, and provide advance threat warning.”

Thus, as time goes on, the Pentagon will have to invest more to ensure America retains its superiority in space.

Dave Majumdar is the defense editor for The National Interest. You can follow him on Twitter: @davemajumdar.

Source: National Interest “The Secret Way China and Russia Would Crush America in a War”

Note: This is National Interest’s article I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean that I agree or disagree with the article’s views.

Advertisements

10 Comments on “The Secret Way China and Russia Would Crush America in a War”

  1. Swant says:

    The real big story is how the Chinese backed down to end the Doklam Standoff on the border. The Chinese paper tiger has had its tail twisted.

    Like

    • chankaiyee2 says:

      India sent its troops to provoke China so that China responds with sending its troops there. Now India agrees to retreat so that China also retreat. Who is baking down?
      China is wise not to start a war it can easily win. See my post today titled “China Wise to Find Peaceful Solution to Border Standoff with India” as defeating India is not its strategic goal.

      Liked by 2 people

    • alking1957 says:

      Indian troops retreated back to their border = chinese backdown ? Is this some magic Indian logic?

      Like

    • Chin Kwaai Lan says:

      Baffling remark. It’s India that is disengaging.
      From an Al-Jazeera news report:
      “On this basis, expeditious disengagement of border personnel at the face-off site at Doklam has been agreed to and is ongoing.

      China said Indian troops had withdrawn from the remote area in the eastern Himalayas. Hua Chunying, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson, said Chinese troops would continue to patrol the Doklam region.”

      China could have merely changed patrol guards to satisfy India.
      It is wise of India to move out of this mess.

      Like

    • Joseph says:

      Well, it’s an era of fake news and feel good story, until the spanking begins. It should remind India that in 1962, Zhou Enlai also backed down several times to give room for peaceful solution to avoid conflict. But Nehru interpreted it as a sign of China was a paper tiger and boast India’s ‘superiority’. After the spanking, Nehru would potray India as frail victims being bullied, to this day. Perhaps another spanking is a good thing. After all, China is not America, where Donald Trump’s fire and furry means he will outsource it to China.

      Like

  2. Joseph says:

    Secret? Hardly. To American perhaps. But not to the rest of the world. American invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq had revealed serious flaws that shattered the myth of indomitable military that the American is trying to build. China had done impressive jobs to modernize in the 2000s. But no one thought it was enough to match the American. All the American had to do was sit tight and let people doubt. But they have to challenge China in SCS to satisfy their century-old China-bashing ego and lost in the process. Now that their bluff is exposed, they only reveal the obvious hole in their military doctrine, with old derelict ships and equipment, undisciplined personnels and bungled military researches. To make matter worse, the Russian is back from the dead smelling the stench of dying American. It may be a secret to the American, but we can see it clearly. Especially in the region, where American Pacific commander admiral Aucoin is fired because ships under his command keep getting sodomized by commercial vessels. This is what the American get for having naval commander who has only war in his mind, and not thinking about his ships disciplines and maintenance.

    Like

  3. Foxhound says:

    Thus, as time goes on, the Pentagon will have to invest more to ensure America retains its superiority in space.
    All is in the conclusion. Since the middle of the 2000’s US superiority in weapons is step by step declining everywhere. Nearly all US assets are jeopardized, like this new chinese technology :
    http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/2021235/end-stealth-new-chinese-radar-capable-detecting-invisible-targets-100km

    Hence US military complex wants to respond by space militarization.

    Like

  4. Allen Lau says:

    Pages of rambling about unsubstantiated threats comes down to the last sentence….
    “as time goes on, the Pentagon will have to invest more to ensure America retains its superiority in space.” …. which translates to more money / weapons please for the Pentagon.

    Liked by 1 person