According to he website of China Aerospace Science & Industry Corporation (CASIC), Office No. 206 of CASIC’s Second Institute has given priority to the research in electromagnetic launch of missile and phalanx close-in air defense and made unspecified breakthroughs. No details have been given of the breakthroughs perhaps due to confidentiality.
The website says that the office is conducting vigorous research and development in that area because that technology is among the “five new generations” of technology for China. It regards the technology as a new-type advanced launching technology in terms of speed, range, firepower and response capabilities.
The office has set up a High Energy Electromagnetic Technology Young Creation Office of young researchers as the technology can significantly improve the capabilities and speed of missile launching and reduce the mass of the carrier of a missile and the operation and maintenance costs of the launching devices. It will be a revolution in military technology.
However, the website points out that further efforts are necessary to actually be able to apply the technology.
Source: mil.huanqiu.com “China has made breakthrough in electromagnetic launching technology with revolutionary firepower” (summary by Chan Kai Yee based on the report in Chinese)
Zachary Keck, managing editor of American magazine The National Interest, posted an article titled “No, China Can NOT Shoot Down 90% of Hypersonic Missiles” to refute media reports on Chinese Type 1130 warship gun’s capability to intercept hypersonic missiles.
What he says about hypersonic weapons is entirely correct, but his conclusion tht the gun cannot even intercept subsonic missile shows his ignorance about the weapon.
I described the gun in my post “China’s New Warship Gun Able to Intercept 4-mach Anti-ship Missile” on January 14, 2013 based on Chinese government’s mouthpiece people.com.cn’s report “Our country’s new-type warship gun world advanced, perhaps able to intercept mach-4 anti-ship missiles”.
We all know that due to Chinese military’s habit to keep secret about its advanced weapons, such official description of China’s advanced weapon is rare. Moreover, as the report caters Chinese people, there is no need to exaggerate.
The report is quite long and gives details of the reasons for and course of the development of the gun. It compares Type 1130 gun with its US counterpart and describes where it is better. I only gave a short summary.
I wonder whether US intelligence monitors Chinese media carefully. Obviously, American people are ignorant about China’s progress in its arms race with the US and perhaps they do not even know that there is such an arms race. That is why even such an expert as Zachary Keck mentions only Taiwan and other countries’ sources instead of Chinese ones.
Underestimate of its enemies has been the major cause for US failures in the wars in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. When US general took the enemy seriously and did not enter enemy’s territory until the US had overwhelming superiority, the US won landslide victory in the Gulf War.
If the US rests at ease that it can destroy Chinese navy with subsonic missiles while China is developing hypersonic anti-ship missiles, it will add one more fairlue to quite a few past ones.
I wrote my book Space Era Strategy: The Way China Beats the U.S. to warn American people. I did so in order that there will be balance of strength in the world to avoid war, but perhaps the US is destined to decline, no one can prevent that.
The following is the full text of The National Interest’s article:
No, China Can NOT Shoot Down 90% of Hypersonic Missiles
A number of media outlets have reported in recent days that China has deployed a new missile defense system on many of its ships that has a 90 percent success rate against hypersonic missiles. The same reports also unwittingly highlight that this assertion is false.
All the reports appear to originate from a story the Taiwan-based Want China Times carried last month. Citing a report in its “Chinese-language sister paper Want Daily,” which itself cited a story by an unnamed Russian media outlet, Want China Times reported last month that “that China’s latest indigenous Type 1130 close-in weapon system can fire 10,000 rounds per minute and destroy 90% of hypersonic missiles traveling at a speed four times the speed of sound.”
The Want China Times report has been picked up by numerous news outlets since— either directly or indirectly. For example, citing the Want China Times article, International Business Times reported last month that “China has developed a new close-in weapon system” that can “reportedly destroy 90 percent of hypersonic missiles even travelling four times the speed of sound.” Earlier today, Engineering.com ran a story based on the IBT report that was headlined, “Chinese Chain Gun Can Destroy Almost Every Hypersonic Missile.”
Meanwhile, yesterday Gawker media’s design and technology website, Gitzmodo, ran a story headlined “Say Hello to China’s New 11-Barrel Hypersonic Missile Killer.” In that article, Gitzmodo staff writer Andrew Tarantola cites the Want China Times article (which he refers to as a Chinese media outlet) in reporting that “China’s newly unveiled Type 1130 close-in weapon system can make short work of inbound warheads traveling at four times the speed of sound [emphasis in the original].” Later in the piece he reports that the Type 1130 is “quite accurate, notching 90 percent accuracy against hypersonic threats,” before concluding, ominously, that “Combined with the PLA’s new WU-14 hypersonic glide vehicle, naval battles may soon be over in the blink of an eye.”
There are a number of issues with all this. The first, and least egregious, is that the Type 1130 CIWS system is not particularly new. In fact, it was first noted by Western defense analysts as far back as May 2011, albeit at the time it was still in development and referred to as the Type 1030. However, by the time China’s aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, began sea trials the following year, the gun-based CIWS was being called by its current name (noted, the Type 1130 is also called the H/PJ-14). Thus, at the very least, the Type 1130 is about two and a half years old.
Far more importantly, however, by these reports own admission, the Type 1130 CIWS can’t shoot down hypersonic missiles. As noted above, these reports claim that the Type 1130 CIWS can target missiles traveling at up to four times the speed of sound, or Mach 4. As impressive as these reports make Mach 4 out to be, it doesn’t reach hypersonic levels. To constitute hypersonic, the missile must travel at five times the speed of sound (Mach 5) or greater. NASA further categorizes speeds as hypersonic (between Mach 5 and Mach 10) and high hypersonic (between Mach 10 and Mach 25). This oversight— calling Mach 4 hypersonic— is particularly surprising given that it was featured on science and technology websites Gizmodo and Engineering.com.
There are other smaller issues with the claims as well. For example, no country currently deploys hypersonic missiles, raising the question of how the Type 1130 achieved its 90 percent success rate in shooting them down. In fact, it’s unclear where the 90 percent success rate statistic comes from at all, although one possible culprit is a report by a Chinese state-run television station. Needless to say, this is another source that should be taken with a grain of salt.
Finally, while no country currently deploys hypersonic missiles, any that China’s potential adversaries like the United States would deploy in the foreseeable future are almost certainly going to be long range missiles (for example, as part of Prompt Global Strike). Since the Type 1130 CIWS can’t even shoot down medium or long-range subsonic missiles it’s a good bet that it will struggle with hypersonic ones.
Zachary Keck is managing editor of The National Interest. You can find him on Twitter: @ZacharyKeck
Source: The National Interest “No, China Can NOT Shoot Down 90% of Hypersonic Missiles”