Hardline Deplomacy Natural Development of China Can Say No.


In its report “Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi defends ‘wolf warrior’ diplomats for standing up to ‘smears’ ”, SCMP says “Some diplomats have adopted an increasingly combative tone that has caused increasing friction, particularly with the United States”, but “Minister (Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi) tells ‘two sessions’ press conference that country will ‘hit back against malicious slanders and firmly defend national honour’”.

On December 17, 2017, I had a post “Xi Jinping Thought, Declaration of ‘China Can Say No’ (1)” in which I say:

Say no to what?

Say no to Western capitalist ideology while advocates Marxism

Say no to Westernization while advocates socialism with Chinese characteristics;

Say no to multiparty democracy while advocates one-party autocracy;

Say no to Western values while advocates China’s socialist core values;

Say no to Western human rights while advocates Chinese human rights;

Say no to Western press freedom while advocates China’s censorship and control of media; etc.

The post was followed by quite a few post on “China Can Say No” such as “China Says No to Western, Advocates Its Own Human Rights Standards” on December 16, 2017, “Xi Jinping Says No to Internet Liberty, Stressing Cyber Sovereignty” on December 19, 2017, “China Held World Multi-party Meeting to Say No to Western Democracy” and “China Held World Forum to Promote Its Human Rights System” on December 20, 2017, etc.

Therefore, the hardline diplomacy hitting “back against malicious slanders and firmly defend national honour” is but a natural development of “China Can Say No”.

Comment by Chan Kai Yee on SCMP’s report, full text of which can be found at https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3085856/chinese-foreign-minister-wang-yi-defends-wolf-warrior?utm_medium=email&utm_source=mailchimp&utm_campaign=enlz-gme_china_at_a_crossroads%3A_two_sessions_2020&utm_content=20200525&MCUID=4d890973ef&MCCampaignID=2965112e2e&MCAccountID=7b1e9e7f8075914aba9cff17f&tc=7


China attacks U.S. at G20 as the world’s biggest source of instability


November 23, 2019 / 7:32 PM / Updated 13 hours ago

BEIJING (Reuters) – The United States is the world’s biggest source of instability and its politicians are going around the world baselessly smearing China, the Chinese government’s top diplomat said on Saturday in a stinging attack at a G20 meeting in Japan.

Photo Wang Yi

FILE PHOTO – China’s top diplomat State Councillor Wang Yi speaks during a meeting with Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Moscow, Russia April 5, 2018. REUTERS/Sergei Karpukhin

Relations between the world’s two largest economies have nose-dived amid a bitter trade war – which they are trying to resolve – and arguments over human rights, Hong Kong and U.S. support for Chinese-claimed Taiwan.

Meeting Dutch Foreign Minister Stef Blok on the sidelines of a G20 foreign ministers meeting in the Japanese city of Nagoya, Chinese State Councillor Wang Yi did not hold back in his criticism of the United States.

The United States is broadly engaged in unilateralism and protectionism, and is damaging multilateralism and the multilateral trading system. It has already become the world’s biggest destabilizing factor,” China’s Foreign Ministry cited Wang as saying.

The United States has, for political purposes, used the machine of state to suppress legitimate Chinese businesses and has groundlessly laid charges against them, which is an act of bullying, he added.

Certain U.S. politicians have smeared China everywhere in the world, but have not produced any evidence.”

The United States has also used its domestic law to “crudely interfere” in China’s internal affairs, trying to damage “one country, two systems” and Hong Kong’s stability and prosperity, he added.

China was incensed this week after the U.S. House of Representatives passed two bills to back protesters in Hong Kong and send a warning to China about human rights, with President Donald Trump expected to sign them into law, despite delicate trade talks with Beijing.

China runs Hong Kong under a “one country, two systems” model whereby the territory enjoys freedoms not enjoyed in mainland China like a free press, though many people in Hong Kong fear Beijing is eroding this. The government denies that.

Wang said that China’s development and growth was an inevitable trend of history that no force could stop.

There is no way out for the zero-sum games of the United States. Only win-win cooperation between China and the United States is the right path.”

Reporting by Cate Cadell; Writing by Ben Blanchard; Editing by Ros Russell

Source: Reuters “China attacks U.S. at G20 as the world’s biggest source of instability”


Chinese FM Proud of Anti-Terrorism Achievements in Xinjiang


Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi spoke about China’s anti-terrorism success in China’s Xinjiang at a UN Security Council meeting. SubChina regards it as Wang’s offensive about Xinjiang in its report “Exclusive: China on the offensive about Xinjiang — raises issue at U.N.” on September 25.

Wang’s speech was relevant as it was a meeting on the cooperation between the U.N. and regional organizations in countering terrorist threats. He only wanted to stress China’s important contribution to global fight against terrorism. China is proud of its success and believes it sets a good example for other countries.

It’s a fact “recognized by all foreigners who have been to Xinjiang” Wang said.

The report says “China’s move to raise the Uyghur issue follows on the heels of President Donald Trump’s ‘Global Call to Protect Religious Freedom’ event, which took place at U.N. headquarters on Monday during the Climate Action Summit.”

It proves that Trump’s speech was a willful offensive at a summit on climate irrelevant with religious freedom. The US has been the leader of Western attack at China’s anti-terrorism policies based on hearsays instead of facts.

However, the UN has disregarded such attack as proved by UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres authorizing a visit of the UN’s top counter-terrorism official, Vladirimir Voronkov, to China including Xinjiang’s capital Urumqi.

The report cannot deny China’s success in ovecoming terrorism so that it has to quote Wang as saying, “Between 1990 and 2016, Xinjiang of China was plagued by violent terrorist activities, suffering from thousands of terrorist attacks, and, in the worst times, one incident per day. In contrast, the past three years saw no such incident in Xinjiang.”

All Muslim nations are satisfied with China’s treatment of Uighurs in its efforts to eliminate terrorism and extremism so that the US and its followers have no factual grounds to attack China with the excuse of human rights.

US attack is intended on containing China’s rise. The report cannot deny that. It mentions US Sanate’s bill with China’s “expanding influence in international organizations,” including the United Nations as the subject of the bill.

The attack on China’s human rights in Xinjiang only reflects US helplessness in containing China.

Comment by Chan Kai Yee on SubChina’s report, full text of which can be viewed at https://supchina.com/2019/09/25/exclusive-china-on-the-offensive-about-xinjiang-raises-issue-at-u-n/


Chinese FM debunks rumors about Xinjiang with facts


Published 11:35, 25-Sep-2019 Updated 22:22, 25-Sep-2019

CGTN

Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi debunked rumors about China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region with facts when giving a keynote speech on Tuesday.

The government of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region has recently taken a series of preventative measures against terrorism, Wang said while addressing a dinner co-hosted by the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, the U.S.-China Business Council, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Council on Foreign Relations.

This is purely China’s internal affair, yet, it has been deliberately distorted and attacked by some anti-China forces in the world, he said.

Giving some facts about Xinjiang, Wang said that the Chinese government has all along attached importance to the region’s stability and development and to preserving its religion and culture.

In the past 64 years since the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region was established, the local economy has grown by some 200 times, and tens of thousands of local people have been lifted out of poverty, he said.

Nowadays, on average there is a mosque for every 530 Muslim people in Xinjiang, a rate which is higher than that of many Muslim countries, said Wang, after expounding the fact that both the numbers of religious sites and clerical personnel in Xinjiang have increased tenfold compared with several decades ago.

However, people of different ethnicities in Xinjiang suffer greatly from extremism and terrorism, said Wang.

There have been several thousand cases of violent terrorism there since the 1990s, claiming the lives of several thousand innocent people and injuring many others, he said.

The attacks took a heavy toll on the life and property of the local people and their freedom of religious belief and other fundamental human rights, he added.

The measures taken in Xinjiang in recent years have a clear-cut purpose, which is to prevent extremism and terrorism at their root, Wang said, noting that these measures are consistent with Chinese law and common approaches advocated in the global community.

According to the United Nations (UN) Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism, poverty, unemployment, the absence of alternative employment opportunities and low levels of education, along with the distortion and exploitation by violent extremist groups of religious beliefs, are the main causes of violent extremism, said Wang.

The UN Plan of Action suggests early engagement and complementing the actions to counter violent extremism with preventive measures, and that is precisely what has been done in Xinjiang, he said, adding that visible progress has been made based on the fact that there has not been a single case of violent terrorism in the past three years.

Referring to the education and training centers in Xinjiang, Wang said these centers are schools that help the people free themselves from the influence of extremism and terrorism, and acquire professional skills.

Source(s): Xinhua News Agency

Source: CGTN “Chinese FM debunks rumors about Xinjiang with facts”

Note: This is CGTN’s report I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean that I agree or disagree with the report’ views.


China says ties with India insulated from differences on Belt and Road Initiative


Atul Aneja Beijing, April 19, 2019 11:24 IST
Updated: April 19, 2019 17:22 IST

Chinese foreign minister and state councillor Wang Yi says both nations were limiting the threshold of their differences so that overall development of ties remained unhampered.

China on Friday said its ties with India had a “bright future” and they were preparing for a summit between their leaders as a follow-up to last year’s two-day across-the board Wuhan informal summit between President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

At a press conference on a three-day Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation that begins on May 25, Chinese foreign minister and state councillor Wang Yi was emphatic that ties between India and China were insulated from their differences on the Beijing-led Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

Thirty-seven heads of state or heads of government, including leaders from Russia, Italy, Hungary, Austria, Switzerland, Malaysia and Singapore, as well as high level representatives from France, Germany, UK, Spain the European Union and Republic of Korea, will attend the mega event.

Mr. Wang said, “The two leaders [President Xi and Prime Minister Modi] had a very successful meeting in Wuhan. Particularly, they established mutual trust and they jointly planned for the future of improvement and the strengthening of the China-India relationship. After the Wuhan summit, we see progress in all areas of cooperation.”

Mr. Wang pointed out that India and China were limiting the threshold of their differences so that overall development of ties remained unhampered. “China and India are two major countries and neighbouring countries to each other. It is natural for us to have differences…I remember Prime Minister Modi has mentioned many times that [we] cannot escalate our differences into disputes,” he said.

“The Indian side wants to put our differences at a proper level in order not to interfere in the proper development of our relations. This is in fundamental interest of the people of two countries and China is happy to see [that],” he noted.

China, he said, understood India’s “concerns” about the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), but counselled New Delhi not to view the project—a flagship of the BRI—as an infringement of its “sovereignty”.

Mr. Wang said, “One of our fundamental differences is how to look at the Belt and Road Initiative. The Indian side has their concerns. We understand that and that’s why we stated clearly on various occasions that the Belt and Road Initiative, including the CPEC, is only an economic initiative.” CPEC should be de-linked from a territorial dispute that was rooted in history.

India’s stance on CPEC

India has slammed CPEC, stating that it was an affront to its sovereignty as it passes through Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK).

Mr. Wang contended that the CPEC did not “target any third country” and had “nothing to do with sovereign and territorial dispute left over from history between the two countries.

He said, “Of course, India has its basic position on these disputes. Our cooperation will not undermine any party’s position on those issues. Those issues left over from the history must be separated from our efforts in this area. I think such cooperation will not undermine the basic position on sovereignty and territorial integrity and at the same time will provide you more opportunity of development and help India in modernisation endeavour. I believe this is a good option and good choice for India.”

The Chinese top diplomat rubbished accusations that BRI projects were “debt traps”. Instead, he said, the mega-connectivity project to revive the ancient Silk Road had generated benefits. The total trade volume between China and participating countries had surpassed 6 trillion dollars and investments had scaled 80 billion dollars, generating 300,000 jobs, he pointed out.

In a veiled reference to the United States, he said, “Some country when it cannot succeed, it doesn’t want other countries to succeed either. And this sour grape mentality is in no one’s benefit.”

An “advisory council”, comprising eminent international personalities, had been formed to impart “high quality” to projects under the BRI banner. “To my knowledge, the advisory council will submit a policy suggestion report to the second forum, which contains many good suggestions. We welcome more constructive voices to the Belt and Road,” Mr. Wang observed.

Source: The Hindu “China says ties with India insulated from differences on Belt and Road Initiative”

Note: This is The Hindu’s report I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean that I agree or disagree with the report’ views.


Amid trade talks, China urges U.S. to respect its right to develop, prosper


February 20, 2019

BEIJING (Reuters) – The United States should respect China’s right to develop and become prosperous, the Chinese government’s top diplomat told a visiting U.S. delegation, reiterating that the country’s doors to the outside world would open wider.

The world’s two largest economies began their latest round of trade talks this week to resolve a bitter dispute in which each has levied tariffs on imports from the other.

U.S. trade representative to testify on China next week

The United States has accused China of unfair trade practices, including forced technology transfers, charges it has denied.

Respect and cooperation are the correct choice for both countries, something the international community hopes to see, State Councillor Wang Yi told the delegation of U.S. business leaders and former officials in Beijing on Tuesday.

“Just like the United States, China also has the right to development, and the Chinese people also have the right to have a good life,” the foreign ministry paraphrased Wang as saying, in a statement issued on Wednesday.

“The U.S. side should recognize that China’s development is in the world’s interest, as well as the United States’. Only by seeing China’s development as an opportunity for the United States can this help resolve certain problems, including trade and economic ones,” Wang said.

China’s reform and steps to open up are in line with its development needs, and its doors to the outside world will open ever wider, he added, repeating previous government pledges.

“As long as China and the United States proactively meet each other halfway, then trade and economic cooperation can still play a role as a ballast stone in Sino-U.S. ties,” he said.

The U.S. delegation included former U.S. National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, U.S. Chamber of Commerce Executive Vice President Myron Brilliant, and U.S. Chamber of Commerce China Center President Jeremie Waterman.

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump said trade talks with China were going well and suggested he was open to pushing back the March 1 deadline to complete negotiations, saying it was not a “magical” date.

Tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports are set to rise to 25 percent from 10 percent by March 1 if the partners do not settle their trade dispute, but Trump has suggested several times that he would be open to postponing the deadline.

Negotiations in Washington this week follow a week of talks in the Chinese capital that ended last week without a deal but which officials said had brought progress on some key issues.

Widely-read tabloid the Global Times, published by the ruling Communist Party’s official People’s Daily, said in a Wednesday editorial that both sides must remain calm during the current talks, but that Washington must not force anything on Beijing.

“U.S. demand for China’s structural reform must stay in line with China-U.S. trade cooperation and coordinate with China’s reform and opening-up. The talks must not try to force Beijing to change its economic governance or even its development path,” it said.

“China and the U.S. must sign an agreement that will inspire their people, heralding accelerated economic development.”

Reporting by Ben Blanchard; Editing by Clarence Fernandez and Darren Schuettler

Source: Reuters “Amid trade talks, China urges U.S. to respect its right to develop, prosper”

Note: This is Reuters’ report I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean that I agree or disagree with the report’ views.


China hails Trump-Xi summit, but offers no new details


December 6, 2018

BEIJING (Reuters) – The summit between President Xi Jinping and his U.S. counterpart Donald Trump in Argentina was “friendly and candid” and would help to avoid further trade tensions, a senior Chinese diplomat said on Thursday, but offered no new details on the talks.

The two leaders held high stakes discussions on the sidelines of the G20 meeting in Buenos Aires last week and agreed to a ceasefire in their trade war.

State Councillor Wang Yi, the Chinese government’s top diplomat, said the talks about trade frictions had been extremely positive and constructive, helping reach a consensus that worked for both China and the United States.

Xi and Trump had “deep exchanges in a friendly and candid atmosphere”, setting the direction for an appropriate resolution to the problems between the two countries, Wang said, in a statement carried on the foreign ministry’s website.

“The two sides agreed to jointly promote Sino-U.S. relations based on coordination, cooperation and stability, and promote exchanges and cooperation in various fields in the two countries to achieve even more results,” he added.

“The discussions on economic and trade issues between the two sides were very positive and constructive, and reached a principled consensus.”

That consensus included preventing trade frictions from spreading, returning to dialogue to resolve issues, and a joint goal of cooperation to benefit the global economy, Wang said.

“All of these help to safeguard China’s legitimate interests, and are also in the interests of the United States, and even more are in line with the expectations of the international community,” he added.

The two countries have hit each other with tit-for-tariffs on goods worth hundreds of billions of dollars in sectors from automobiles to agriculture and energy, stymieing trade and redrawing global supply chains.

The United States has levied additional duties of between 10 percent and 25 percent on $250 billion of Chinese goods this year as punishment for what it calls China’s unfair trade practices. China has responded with its own tariffs.

But as part of the truce agreed to by Xi and Trump, the United States will not raise tariffs further on Jan. 1, so further talks can take place.

Wang said the facts will prove that the common interests between China and the United States are greater than our differences, and cooperation needs to be greater than friction.

However he offered no new details on what China had agreed to with the United States.

China expressed confidence on Wednesday that it can reach a trade deal with the United States, a sentiment echoed by Trump a day after he warned of more tariffs if the two sides could not resolve their differences.

The White House has said China had committed to start buying more American products and lifting tariff and non-tariff barriers immediately, while beginning talks on structural changes with respect to forced technology transfers and intellectual property protection.

China’s Commerce Ministry is due to hold its weekly news briefing later on Thursday, where it could offer more details on China’s understanding of what had been agreed to.

Reporting by Ben Blanchard; Additional reporting by Adam Jourdan in Shanghai; Editing by Michael Perry

Source: Reuters “China hails Trump-Xi summit, but offers no new details”

Note: This is Reuters’ report I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean that I agree or disagree with the report’ views.