Scientists at America’s top nuclear lab were recruited by China to design missiles and drones, report says


“China is playing a game that we are not prepared for, and we need to really begin to mobilize,” said Greg Levesque, the lead author of the report by Strider Technologies.

By Ken Dilanian

At least 154 Chinese scientists who worked on government-sponsored research at the U.S.’s foremost national security laboratory over the last two decades have been recruited to do scientific work in China — some of which helped advance military technology that threatens American national security — according to a new private intelligence report obtained by NBC News.

The report, by Strider Technologies, describes what it calls a systemic effort by the government of China to place Chinese scientists at Los Alamos National Laboratory, where nuclear weapons were first developed.

Many of the scientists were later lured back to China to help make advances in such technologies as deep-earth-penetrating warheads, hypersonic missiles, quiet submarines and drones, according to the report.

Scientists were paid as much as $1 million through participation in Chinese government “talent programs,” which are designed to recruit Chinese scientists to return to China. Such talent programs have long been identified as a source of concern, but U.S. officials said they had not previously seen an unclassified report that described the phenomenon in such detail, naming specific scientists and the projects they have worked on.

The talent transfer “poses a direct threat to U.S. national security,” said Greg Levesque, a co-founder of Strider and the lead author of the report. “China is playing a game that we are not prepared for, and we need to really begin to mobilize.”

Although a former Los Alamos scientist pleaded guilty in 2020 to lying about his involvement in a China recruitment program, most of the conduct described in the report appears to have been legal. Moreover, U.S. officials and experts say most Chinese scientists who immigrate to the U.S. remain here — and many have made significant contributions to U.S. defense technology.

But current and former U.S. intelligence officials said the Strider report shows how the Chinese government has been using talent recruitment programs to acquire insights into U.S. technology to help build a military that poses a significant threat to U.S. national security. The officials added that China’s hard-line turn under President Xi Jinping is sparking a re-evaluation of the long history of scientific exchange between the two countries.

“We have benefited enormously from the inflow of Chinese talent,” said Robert Daly, a China expert at the Wilson Center, a congressionally chartered nonpartisan research institute. “And I hope that we can continue to do that — it’s essential to the United States. But China is now developing weapons systems, capabilities, doctrines and, frankly, attitudes toward its own power that means we have to go back to the drawing board in some of these areas.”

In 2019, a bipartisan Senate report said China’s Thousand Talents Program and similar arrangements were a vector for China to exploit U.S. research.

“Through talent recruitment programs like the Thousand Talents, China pays scientists at American universities to secretly bring our knowledge and innovation back to China — including valuable, federally funded research,” FBI Director Christopher Wray said in a speech in 2020. “To put it bluntly, this means American taxpayers are effectively footing the bill for China’s own technological development.”

Los Alamos, where the atomic bomb was developed during World War II, is devoted to science and engineering in support of U.S. national security. But much of the research there is unclassified, and many foreign scientists work at the lab.

Image Los Alamos workers

Workers at Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los Alamos, N.M.Los Alamos National Laboratory via AP file

Los Alamos officials referred questions to the Energy Department, which declined to address the report’s specific findings.

The Energy Department said in a statement to NBC News that America’s “national security and defense require fierce protection of critical technology development, even as we safeguard the open science research that underwrites the United States’ technology leadership.

“In response to growing research security threats, the Department of Energy has taken significant steps in recent years, including the adoption of rigorous vetting, counterintelligence reviews, and restrictions on participation in foreign talent programs,” the agency added. “The Department of Energy also implements procedures to ensure compliance with U.S. export licensing requirements, including those governing the release of controlled technology to foreign nationals in the United States.”

The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not respond to a request for comment.

The Strider report says that in 2019 the Energy Department adopted a rule prohibiting employees and contractors from participating in talent programs linked to China, Russia, Iran and North Korea. The rule appears to have reduced the brain drain, the report says.

The Justice Department in 2018 launched what it called the China Initiative, an effort to thwart China from stealing cutting-edge research. A series of cases blew up amid allegations of racial profiling, and the Justice Department abandoned the initiative last year. National security officials say the threat from Chinese espionage — and legal acquisition by China of U.S. intellectual property — persists, however.

Bill Evanina, who worked from 2014 to 2021 as the top counterintelligence official in the U.S. government, said he has seen many classified reports over the years documenting the problem of technology transfer through talent-poaching.

However, he said, “this is the first time where we have a comprehensive, open-source reporting that identifies the people, the places, the services and the organizations in China who are benefiting from that talent who once worked here at national labs.”

Evanina and other officials said Los Alamos is by no means an outlier — China is recruiting scientists at other national labs and major research centers across the U.S.

Citing public information posted on websites in the U.S. and China, the report includes specific information about a number of scientists.

For instance, according to the report, Zhao Yusheng received nearly $20 million in U.S. taxpayer grants during an 18-year career at Los Alamos, where he held a top-secret Q clearance and led a defense project developing bombs that can penetrate deep underground.

Then, in 2016, Zhao joined a talent program, Strider found, and left the U.S. for a job at a research center in China. The report notes that before that, while he was at Los Alamos, he hired another Chinese scientist who worked with him on the bomb research. That scientist filed a patent in China in 2007 for an “ultra thick penetrating warhead,” according to the report.

Zhao is now a vice president at China’s Southern University of Science and Technology, known as SUStech, which conducts defense research. He did not respond to requests for comment.

“The correct number of Chinese or Russian citizens at our weapon labs should be zero,” said Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee. “We cannot turn a blind eye to the vulnerable position the U.S. is put in when foreign adversaries are able to access critical U.S. technologies.”

The Strider report found that 15 Los Alamos veterans work at SUStech, including the president, Chen Shiyi, who made major contributions to China’s hypersonic missile program. Chen did not respond to emails.

“No one can say this is not a national security issue,” Evanina said. “Because from hypersonics to acoustical capabilities and to warheads, we are perpetrating the ability for adversaries to utilize weapons against us. And that is hard for any American to swallow.”

Source: NbC news “Scientists at America’s top nuclear lab were recruited by China to design missiles and drones, report says”

Note: This is NBC news’ article I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the article’s views.


With US ‘Super Choppers’ On Radar, China Says Its ‘Future Helicopters’ Will Be Equipped With Ground-Breaking Technologies


By Ashish Dangwal- April 20, 2022

Militaries all around the world are looking at integrating modern technology into their military weapons. China, as usual, appears to be making serious efforts to prepare for the future battleground, this time, with plans to include artificial intelligence and high-speed features in its future choppers.

During a recent public lecture, a prominent Chinese military helicopter designer disclosed the potential essential features of future choppers, namely high speeds and artificial intelligence (AI), the Global Times reported.

This provides a look into the potential of the country’s next-generation helicopter, which might have whole new designs and arrangements.

The report highlights the US projects, noting, “The world has made concrete steps in the development and application of high-speed rotorcraft, with the US commissioning the V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor transport aircraft and conducting test flights for the S-97 Raider and SB-1 Defiant helicopters.”

By this, Wu Ximing, deputy chairman of the Chinese Aeronautical Establishment, stated on Sunday during a lecture hosted by the China Science and Technology Museum that in 10 years, it will be the standard for helicopters, or rotorcraft in general, to feature high speeds.

The new helicopters will be substantially different from the usual configuration of earlier helicopters. This includes those designed to exceed the conventional design’s physical speed limit of roughly 300 kilometers per hour, according to Wu, who is also the principal designer of the Z-10, the Chinese military’s main battle assault helicopter.

To attain high speeds while keeping vertical takeoff and landing capabilities, helicopter designers will need to experiment and innovate, according to Wu. He went on to suggest a general time limit of 10 years for most helicopters to attain high speed.

China-Z-20
File Image: Chinese Z-20 Choppers

According to reports, China’s helicopter manufacturers have performed test flights for at least two types of helicopters with novel designs: one is a blended-wing body multi-rotor vertical takeoff and landing aircraft, while the other is a helicopter with a completely innovative design.

Will AI Make PLA’s Future Choppers More Lethal?

The incorporation of AI in the future helicopter means that a digital helmet or screen may replace the helicopter’s control levers since AI can comprehend voice orders from the pilot.

According to Wu, it can also provide recommendations on flight paths and even make independent judgments in tough situations or complex missions. “Intelligent technologies will greatly reduce the workload of the pilot in flying the chopper.”

AI will allow for an intelligent flight of a single helicopter, coordinated flight of several helicopters, and autonomous mission completion.

With the fast growth of communication technologies such as 5G and 6G, it is feasible that the helicopter may be able to obtain more computational capacity from ground-based devices via a network. This might also improve the capabilities and efficiency of the aircraft.

“The use of AI will apply not only to helicopters but also to aircraft in general, including fighter jets,” one Chinese defense expert told Global Times.

Another future direction for helicopters is the emergence of drones, which do not cause fatalities. They are not limited by the physical limitations of human pilots and may be utilized in difficult locations, according to Wu, while costing less and providing more survivability.

Miniature drone helicopters are also a potential choice for tactical reconnaissance missions because they are easy to transport and can breach hostile defenses silently. For example, the Hummingbird, a compact reconnaissance drone aircraft created by China, is about 17 cm long and weighs only 35 kilos.

America’s Quest To integrate AI

Artificial intelligence is a major emphasis for the US military, which expects it to alter future battles. The complexity of contemporary warfare is also forcing the US military to consider how technology may upgrade existing assets, such as helicopters, to enable them to do previously inconceivable tasks.

“We are going to have to change the way we fight. We are going to have to change some of the equipment that we use, and we are going to have to retrain our people so they can start to think about the fight they have in the future,” Gen. James McConville, US Army Chief of Staff, said during his May 2, 2019 confirmation hearing.

According to the United States Army in Multi-Domain Operations, 2028, these upgrades include next-generation helicopters that can do much more than current models, as well as supporting systems that “can operate in a highly contested operational environment, cannot be easily isolated from the rest of the Joint Force or partners, and can conduct independent maneuver.”

The Army’s current fleet of helicopters is almost 50 years old in some cases. The next generation of these aircraft, according to US military leaders, will need to be quicker, more maneuverable, deadly, and technologically sophisticated, including the capacity to work with autonomous aircraft.

Autonomous Black Hawk Flight – Twitter

The tests in this respect were recently done by the US military. The first autonomous flight took place on February 5, 2022, above Fort Campbell, Kentucky, followed by a second flight on February 7. The AI operated the chopper for 30 minutes without a person on board on the first trip.

In addition to this program, there are several additional projects underway. The US Air Force appears to be reshaping itself in preparation for future battles, particularly against China. As the focus on the Indo-Pacific grows, emerging technology like these will aid Washington in completing operations in a more efficient and timely manner.

Source: EurAsian Times “With US ‘Super Choppers’ On Radar, China Says Its ‘Future Helicopters’ Will Be Equipped With Ground-Breaking Technologies”

Note: This is EurAsian Times’ report I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the article’s views.


Can China’s Quantum Radar Detect Any Submarine?


Today, acoustic detection remains the primary methods to detect and track submarines.

by Sebastien Roblin December 26, 2021

Here’s What You Need To Remember: Kania also notes that Quantum navigation also has implicit offensive potential: these technologies might also be applied to improve missile guidance and enhance precision strike capabilities.

According to some evaluations, today’s cutting-edge submarines like the Virginia- and Sea Wolf-class attack submarines have been evaluated to run only five decibels louder than average oceanic background noises. Even less-expensive Swedish air independent propulsion submarines have successfully passed undetected to sink U.S. carriers during exercises.

Yet some naval analysts are decidedly bearish on the prospects of submarine stealth in the twenty-first century, looking ahead to highly sensitive low-frequency sonars, advanced satellite-based optical sensors that may bypass acoustic-stealth entirely, and powerful computer processors that can churn through vast quantities of data to discriminate faint contacts from background noise. China is even developing a satellite-based laser surveillance system aimed at detecting vessels submerged as deep as five hundred meters.

Recently, the field of quantum mechanics has increasingly shown its potential to disrupt established paradigms in multiple domains of warfare—particularly due to the concept of quantum entanglement, the uncanny phenomenon by which bonded particles continue to uncannily reflect each other’s behavior even across long distances.

Though still facing by range coherence limitations, quantum sensors and communicators could potentially bypass many of the limitations and vulnerabilities of traditional radio-frequency sensors, remaining effective despite jamming or stealthy-aircraft profiles. As detailed in this article, China appears to have taken an early lead in ‘quantum radar’, though how soon the technology can be developed into an operationally viable system remains to be seen.

Today, acoustic detection remains the primary methods to detect and track submarines. Besides active and passive sonars mounted on ships and submarines, they are also fixed in underwater surveillance systems, dropped in buoys by maritime patrol planes like the P-8 Poseidon or Japanese P-1, and hoisted down into the water by anti-submarine helicopters like the MH-60R Seahawk.

However, anti-submarine warriors can draw upon an array of supporting technologies beyond sonar that have historically played a major role.

During World War II, aircraft-borne surface-search radars led to the doom of many German U-Boats, allowing patrol planes to detect and swoop down upon diesel-powered submarines while they were surfaced at night to recharge their batteries. Though snorkels gave submarines a way to sip air without detection, they too are susceptible to detection by modern synthetic-aperture radars. However, though many diesel-electric submarines remain in service, a large share of modern submarines use air-independent propulsion or nuclear-power allowing them to cruise weeks or months respectively before surfacing.

Sub-hunter can also employ “sniffers” that can ‘smell’ the chemicals in the submarine’s diesel exhaust

The SQUID Magnetometer

Another famous submarine-hunting ploy is to use Magnetic Anomaly Detectors triggered by the submarine’s metallic hull. The threat posed by MADs has led navies to de-gauss submarine hulls to minimize magnetic profiles. Germany has specially developed Type 212 and 214 submarines with non-metallic hulls.

However, MADs have very short range, and the P-8 and MH-60R omit a MAD entirely.

Enter, therefore, the SQUID, or Superconducting Quantum Interference Device. Though it might sound like Star Trek technobabble, SQUIDs leverages quantum technology to offer an ultra-sensitive magnetometer. Too sensitive, in fact, as SQUIDs have picked up background noise from stuff as distant as solar flares.

But on June 21, 2017, a Chinese periodical announced that Professor XIamong Xie of the Shanghai Institute of Microsystems and Information Technology had developed cryogenic liquid-nitrogen-cooled SQUID which reduced the noise-problem—and in field-tests, had proven capable of detecting ferrous objects deep underground even when mounted on a helicopter.

After a South China Morning Post article speculated on whether it amounted “to the world’s most powerful submarine detector?” the original article was taken down.

Dave Hambling noted in the New Scientist that Xiamong’s new sensor used an array of SQUIDs to help cancel out background noise.

“Researchers estimate that a SQUID magnetometer of this type could detect a sub from 6 kilometres away, and [Imperial College researcher David] Caplin says that with better noise suppression the range could be much greater.”

A typical MAD, by contrast, is only effective to a few hundred meters, meaning the new SQUID could potentially cover thousands of times more square meters.

In April 14 2019, an article by Defense Procurement International revealed Australia too was researching quantum magnetometer technology for submarine detection—this time apparently intended for a fixed submarine surveillance system.

Professor Andre Luiten of the Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing is quoted thusly: “These magnetometers can detect very small magnetic fields. The goal of this project is to build sensors that go on the seabed which detect the presence of submarines through their properties. You’d essentially set up a trip wire around assets that are of importance to Australia.”

Quantum Compass?

Quantum technology could also serve as advanced navigational sensor—one that could circumvent submarine dependence on orbiting satellites to stay on course.

The Jamestown Foundation’s Elsa Kania and Stephen Armitage note that:

“[Q]uantum navigation could allow for a “new generation of inertial navigation,” enabling high-precision navigation without GPS . . . This so-called “quantum compass” would be particularly useful for submarines and other maritime platforms for which it could enable the pinpointing of their position with high levels of accuracy. Quantum navigation could thus potentially liberate Chinese operational platforms from dependence on space-based positioning systems, which can be easily jammed.”

Kania also notes that Quantum navigation also has implicit offensive potential: these technologies might also be applied to improve missile guidance and enhance precision strike capabilities.

However, satellites, too, could use quantum sensors to influence submarine warfare. Satellites using quantum gravimeters, which could improve sensitivity of sensors designed to detect and measure gravity fields, could potentially detect submarines, or more likely, map out seafloors with new levels of precision.

China has also famously made breakthroughs in using quantum entanglement for encrypted communications by teleporting molecules over long distances. This could conceivably have application to communications with submerged submarines, a technically challenging task—with implications particularly for transmission of orders from a national command authority to launch nuclear weapons.

Time will tell which, if any, of these technologies can be developed into practical operational systems. However, it’s clear that scientists in China and Australia are betting that developments in the field of quantum physics will play their part in changing the rules of undersea warfare in the twenty-first century.

Sébastien Roblin holds a master’s degree in conflict resolution from Georgetown University and served as a university instructor for the Peace Corps in China. He has also worked in education, editing, and refugee resettlement in France and the United States. He currently writes on security and military history for War Is Boring. This article first appeared last year.

Source: National Interest “Can China’s Quantum Radar Detect Any Submarine?”

Note: This is National Interest’s article I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the article’s views.


U.S. ‘not as advanced’ as China and Russia on hypersonic tech, Space Force general warns


While the Pentagon has pushed the development of new hypersonic missiles, the Army isn’t slated to field its first missile until 2024.

By PAUL MCLEARY and ALEXANDER WARD

11/20/2021 04:30 PM EST

HALIFAX, Canada — A top Space Force official admitted on Saturday that the U.S. has “catching up to do very quickly” to match Beijing’s hypersonic capability, one week after China successfully launched a missile that circled the globe before striking a target.

Russia also launched a hypersonic missile from a warship in the Arctic this week, underscoring how quickly Washington, D.C.’s two primary competitors are racing ahead in this technology.

“We’re not as advanced as the Chinese or the Russians in terms of hypersonic programs,” Gen. David Thompson, vice chief of space operations, said during his appearance at the Halifax International Security Forum.

Hypersonic missiles fly at least five times the speed of sound, but their ability to glide on the atmosphere while changing direction at such a high speed makes them virtually impossible — with existing radars — to track and destroy.

While the Pentagon has pushed the development of new hypersonic missiles, the Army isn’t slated to field its first missile until 2024. The Navy is aiming to put its own version of the missile on a destroyer in 2025 and on Virginia-class submarines in 2028.

“It should be no surprise to anyone that China is developing capabilities that would be viewed negatively by like minded allies and partners,” Adm. John Aquilino, head of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, told a small group of reporters on the sideline of the event.

The Space Force is working to “figure out the type of satellite constellation that we need” to track these missiles, Thompson told POLITICO after his public remarks. “It’s a new challenge, but it’s not that we don’t have an answer to this challenge. We just have to understand it, fully design it, and fly it.”

While there’s no timeline for when these new satellites can get into orbit, “we’re evolving our approach and our timelines rapidly,” Thompson said.

Both Thompson and Aquilino expressed concerns for how the often slow and risk-averse acquisition process is affecting the military competition from under the sea and into space.

“The bureaucracy that we’ve built into our defense and acquisition enterprise, not just in space but in other areas, has slowed us down in many areas,” Thompson said. “The fact that we have not needed to move quickly for a couple of decades — in the sense of a strategic competitor with these capabilities — has not driven us or required us to move quickly.”

Chinese leader Xi Jinping has publicly spelled out a plan for his military to achieve parity with the United States by 2027, and become the leading global power by 2050, making Beijing’s rapid development of new weapons unsurprising, Aquilino said.

“We should expect capabilities like that to show up, and I think the answer is our system has to be able to respond much more quickly,” he said.

There is progress at the Pentagon, however. Last month, the military successfully tested a rocket engine meant to launch the hypersonic glide body into the atmosphere. And on Friday, the Missile Defense Agency awarded contracts to Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman in a competition to develop a new hypersonic Glide Phase Interceptor that will be capable of destroying an incoming hypersonic missile.

Source: Politico “U.S. ‘not as advanced’ as China and Russia on hypersonic tech, Space Force general warns”

Note: This is politico.com’s report I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the report’s views.


China has won AI battle with U.S., Pentagon’s ex-software chief says


Reuters

October 11, 2021 2:38 PM HKT Last Updated 23 minutes ago

An autonomous delivery vehicle by Damo is displayed at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai, China July 8, 2021. REUTERS/Yilei Sun

LONDON, Oct 11 (Reuters) – China has won the artificial intelligence battle with the United States and is heading towards global dominance because of its technological advances, the Pentagon’s former software chief told the Financial Times.

China, the world’s second largest economy, is likely to dominate many of the key emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, synthetic biology and genetics within a decade or so, according to Western intelligence assessments.

Nicolas Chaillan, the Pentagon’s first chief software officer who resigned in protest against the slow pace of technological transformation in the U.S. military, said the failure to respond was putting the United States at risk.

“We have no competing fighting chance against China in 15 to 20 years. Right now, it’s already a done deal; it is already over in my opinion,” he told the newspaper. “Whether it takes a war or not is kind of anecdotal.”

China was set to dominate the future of the world, controlling everything from media narratives to geopolitics, he said.

Chaillan blamed sluggish innovation, the reluctance of U.S. companies such as Google (GOOGL.O) to work with the state on AI and extensive ethical debates over the technology.

Google was not immediately available for comment outside business hours.

Chinese companies, Chaillan said, were obliged to work with their government and were making “massive investment” in AI without regard to ethics.

He said U.S. cyber defences in some government departments were at “kindergarten level”.

Chaillan announced his resignation at the beginning of September, saying military officials were repeatedly put in charge of cyber initiatives for which they lacked experience.

A spokesperson for the Department of the Air Force said Frank Kendall, secretary of the U.S. Air Force, had discussed with Chaillan his recommendations for the department’s future software development following his resignation and thanked him for his contributions, the FT said.

Reporting by Guy Faulconbridge; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman, Robert Birsel

Note: This is Reuters’ report I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the report’s views.


China Is Exporting More Sophisticated Products Despite Trade War


Tom Hancock Aug 04 2021, 2:30 AM Aug 05 2021, 8:47 AM

(Bloomberg) — The technological level of China’s exports increased through the trade war with the U.S., according to a new ranking, which predicts the Chinese economy will grow faster than India’s over the next decade.

China ranked 16th globally when judged by the complexity of its exports in 2019, moving up three places ahead of countries including Ireland since the onset of the trade war in 2018, according to a new study by Harvard University’s Growth Lab.

The index measures the diversity and technological sophistication of goods exported by a country as well as the volume of exports. The U.S. ranked 11th, with the gap between the world’s two largest economies more than halving over the past decade.

The data show China was able to increase its ranking despite U.S. tariffs by exporting to other regions, said Tim Cheston, senior research manager at the Growth Lab. “There was an adept move by China to diversify its export destinations for electronics to Europe and elsewhere,” he said.

Data covering the coronavirus pandemic is not yet available, but it may have further boosted the country’s ranking due to a surge in China’s exports. The 2019 data was updated last week.

“There are signs that China will continue to gain market share in sectors because it was able to keep production going,” Cheston added.

A high ranking doesn’t guarantee fast economic growth: Japan has topped the ranking for 19 successive years, while posting sluggish growth. Rather, the gap between a country’s export sophistication and its current level of GDP per capita is the strongest predictor of a country’s future economic expansion, according to the Growth Lab.

China’s export performance contrasts with its almost equally populous but less well-off neighbor India, whose ranking in 2019 was 43rd despite the government’s “Make in India” push. “In the past fefew years we’ve seen India fall off, its generally stagnated when it’s come to export development,” Cheston said. That suggests that when it comes to economic growth “China will outpace India over the next 10 years,” he said.

As China has moved ahead of more developed countries in the ranking, it faces greater challenges in maintaining its progress. Chinese exports “are now at the level of having nearly filled all known areas of global products,” said Cheston. “China must now move from taking know-how from across the world into true innovation, that is going to be a major challenge.”

The index measures the diversity and technological sophistication of goods exported by a country as well as the volume of exports. The U.S. ranked 11th, with the gap between the world’s two largest economies more than halving over the past decade. The data show China was able to increase its ranking despite U.S. tariffs by exporting to other regions, said Tim Cheston, senior research manager at t

“In the past few years we’ve seen India fall off, its generally stagnated when it’s come to export development,” Cheston said. That suggests that when it comes to economic growth “China will outpace India over the next 10 years,” he said. As China has moved ahead of more developed countries in the ranking, it faces greater challenges in maintaining its progress. Chinese exports “are now at the level of having nearly filled all known areas of global products,” said Cheston. “China must now move from taking know-how from across the world into true innovation, that is going to be a major challenge.”

Source: Bloomberg “China Is Exporting More Sophisticated Products Despite Trade War”

Note: This is Bloomberg’s article I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the article’s views.


US Pressure Boosts China’s Tech Development


Foreign Affairs’ article “China’s Sputnic Movent? How Washington Boosted Beijing’s Quest for Tech Dominance” on July 29, 2021 predicts US failute to hinder China’s development of technology by sanctions, cutting of supply of technology products, restriction of technology investment and cooperation, etc.

The article believes Chinese government’s stress and funding are not influencial enough to boost China’s development of technology, which it regards as China’s attempt to achieve technology dominance in the world, but in the entire article, it, in fact, mentions China’s efforts to achieve technology self-reliance. Self-reliance is certainly not dominance.

The article believes that cutting necessary supply of technology products for Chinese private enterprises will cause Chinese entrepreniurs to make great efforts for self-relience on such supplies and finally deprive US enterprises their share in the vast and growing Chinese market.

Comment by Chan Kai Yee on Foreign Affairs’ article, full text of which can be viewed at https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-07-29/chinas-sputnik-moment.


America’s Newest Carrier Is a Fiasco. The Navy Just Admitted Why.


The USS Gerald R. Ford joined the fleet 4 years ago. It has yet to make a single deployment.

BY KYLE MIZOKAMI

JUL 22, 2021

The Chief of Naval Operations, Mike Gilday, says the U.S. Navy built the aircraft carrier USS Ford with too many new technologies.

Now, the Ford is several years behind in its life cycle because of problems with many of those new technologies.

The last of the Ford’s four advanced weapon elevators, the most glaring example of the ship’s tech gone wrong, should enter service later this year.

The head of the U.S. Navy admits the service added too much untested tech to its latest and greatest aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford.

When the Navy first built the Ford, it incorporated nearly two dozen new technologies, some of which are still giving the service headaches 4 years after the ship entered the fleet.

In a presentation recorded for August’s Sea Air Space exposition, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday said adding 23 new features to the Ford was a “mistake” the Navy can’t afford to repeat.

THE STRANGE SAGA OF THE USS FORD

What Went Wrong?

Gilday said he needs to take “a much more deliberate approach with respect to introducing new technologies to any platform”—preferably one that only introduces up to two technologies per ship and thoroughly tests them on land first.

The USS Ford is the inaugural ship in the Ford-class aircraft carriers, the first new class of aircraft carriers in 40 years. The Navy was eager to cram new tech into the Ford, including a new search radar, electromagnetically powered aircraft catapults to replace traditionally steam-powered catapults, a new aircraft recovery system, and 11 electromagnetically powered elevators designed to shuttle bombs and missiles from the ship’s magazine to waiting aircraft.

But technical problems with the new features led to $2.8 billion in cost overruns and delays, resulting in a total ship cost of $13 billion—not including the actual planes on the carrier.

Those delays meant the Navy only commissioned the Ford in 2017, despite laying it down in 2009. Even then, problems lingered, especially with the electromagnetic aircraft launch system (EMALS) and the advanced weapon elevators (AWEs).

The ship’s first full deployment, originally scheduled for 2018, is now set for 2022.

As a result of the Ford fiasco, the Navy is building copies of new tech bound for its Constellation-class frigates on land to ensure they work properly, according to U.S. Naval Institute News. The Navy surprisingly didn’t do this for several pieces of key tech that went into the Ford. Gilday also said the last of the 11 AWEs will be operational sometime this year.

The Ford is currently in shock trials, a series of tests off the coast of Florida designed to ensure the ship can withstand shock and battle damage in wartime. The ship will then enter a maintenance period before its first deployment next year. Hopefully.

Source: Popular Mechanics “America’s Newest Carrier Is a Fiasco. The Navy Just Admitted Why.”

Note: This is Popular Mechanics’ report I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the report’s views.


Chinese Space Station a Looming Threat to US, Experts Say


Tiangong station could aid CCP’s military, diplomatic ambitions

Jack Beyrer and Chuck Ross • June 26, 2021 5:00 am

China will use its space station to advance its military technology and strengthen its influence in foreign countries, experts and lawmakers warn the Washington Free Beacon.

Three Chinese astronauts reached the Tiangong space station on June 17. The project ushers in an expansion of China’s capabilities in space and a boost to its international prestige. The station is home to numerous “dual use” technologies that have military applications that could threaten the United States. As China’s station eclipses the International Space Station in technological capabilities, developing countries may also be more enticed to collaborate with China’s space program.

China has exploited numerous high-tech ventures—included in its space program—to increase surveillance, data sharing, and corporate espionage. Sarah Mineiro, a board member at the Vandenberg Coalition and adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, told the Washington Free Beacon such technologies are cause for concern, and China’s growing space capabilities challenge American power in the ultimate high ground.

“The Chinese do not have a firewall between national security, defense, intelligence in space and civil space,” Mineiro said. “It’s a widely recognized fact that space is increasingly vulnerable. The advantages we derive from space—specifically the national security advantages we derive from space—have long been threatened.”

In 2018, the chief of the Chinese lunar exploration program compared the moon and Mars to contested islands in the South China Sea, which the Chinese military has long laid claim to. Experts warned the space station is a step in the larger Chinese plan to establish a foothold in Earth’s orbit, and eventually on the moon. Rep. Mike Waltz (R., Fla.), a cofounder of the House Space Force Caucus, warned that impending budget constraints under the Biden administration and the growing strength of the Chinese space program could put America out of the game in coming years.

“The Chinese space program is on the rise, it’s young, new, vibrant and ascendant. Our program is stagnant and in some cases declining,” Waltz said. “I hope this administration will engage on the front end with these countries to help them understand what a devil’s bargain it will be to cooperate with the Chinese on their space station.”

The Biden administration did not return a request for comment.

Chinese officials have signaled they will use the space station to develop relationships with other nations. The strategy is similar to one that Beijing deployed during the coronavirus pandemic, as it provided its inferior vaccine to African, Latin American, and other Asian countries. China’s so-called Vaccine Diplomacy has pushed the United States to share doses of vaccines abroad.

“We should expect that as the Chinese build out their space station that we’re going to see them use it as a diplomatic tool,” said Dean Cheng, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

China invited United Nations member states in 2018 to use the space station for research. U.S. officials are also concerned that China is working closely with the Russian space program. In March, Russia and China agreed to begin working toward the construction of a joint moon base.

Brandon Weichert, a space security analyst and author of the 2020 book Winning Space, said China and Russia could surpass the United States in space during the coming decades, a threat that he said calls for strong leadership in the U.S. space industry.

“It could allow them to dominate the Earth-moon system along with the Chinese,” Weichert said of Russia. “We’re in a new space race, it’s going to be a national effort, and we need to plan and resource these longer-term missions.”

The Trump administration established the Space Force in 2019 to better protect American satellites from Russian and Chinese weaponry in space. Biden officials have acknowledged the possibility of Chinese aggression in orbit. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has deemed China a “pacing threat,” and NASA administrator Bill Nelson Said Wednesday he hopes to make the Wolf Amendment—a measure in place forbidding space cooperation with China—permanent due to Chinese space threats.

The administration’s focus, however, might not be sufficient. Beijing is mimicking many of the successful tactics of the U.S. space industry, including supporting its own cadre of private companies to advance the nation’s mission in space. With China’s technological developments advancing at breakneck speed, it is unclear that the United States can long retain its edge on the final frontier.

“In a lot of the areas of space it is not at all clear that they are far behind or even that much behind,” Cheng said. “We should be very careful about assuming they’re behind us.”

Source: Washington Free Beacon “Chinese Space Station a Looming Threat to US, Experts Say”

Note: This is Washington Free Beacon’s article I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the article’s views.


Encirclemeny Boosts China’s Self-reliance in Tech Development


HK01 says in its article “中國太空站自力更生 科技圍堵致技術自主 (Translated by this blogger as “With self-reliance China builds its own space station: Science and technology encirclement causes its technology independence”) that China has to build its own space station as the US banned its participation in the international space station. China, however, has the willpower and talents to develop top technology on its own.

According to the report, the banning boosted China’s self-reliance in developing space technology so successful that it is able to surpass Russia and become the second country in the world to land a rover on the surface of Mars.

Now, the US has once more stepped up its tech encirclement and been banning China’s purchase of semiconductors and equipment. Based on what has happened in space technology the report predicts that the US will enable China to develop its own equipment and knowhow in producing semiconductors. Similar developments will emerge in other sectors where the US has been making hard efforts to contain China.

Cooment by Chan Kai Yee on HK01’s article, full text of which in Chinese can be viewed at https://www.hk01.com/01%E8%A7%80%E9%BB%9E/639836/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E5%A4%AA%E7%A9%BA%E7%AB%99%E8%87%AA%E5%8A%9B%E6%9B%B4%E7%94%9F-%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80%E5%9C%8D%E5%A0%B5%E8%87%B4%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E8%87%AA%E4%B8%BB