Armed drones in future wars: ADF needs asymmetric technology


Australian industry is thinking about the anti-drone challenge, with companies such as EOS developing electronic countermeasures. Above, an anti-drone control centre. Source: EOS

By Kym Bergmann

October 30, 2021

Eventually the technology in science-fiction movies becomes reality, and high-speed robot drones blasting away at individual humans is already happening in grey-zone and under-reported conflicts around the world.

While Australia remains preoccupied with a conflict involving China with massed conventional forces, events in Syria, Gaza, Ukraine and the Caucuses paint a different picture of what a future war might look like.

These hybrid conflicts involve a mixture of old technologies combined with an increasing use of small, relatively cheap aerial systems – including loitering munitions and hand-launched quadcopters – incorporating developments in image recognition software and artificial intelligence.

Greatest progress has been made in ground and air-ground combat, though uninhabited and robotic systems are also making great strides in the air-to-air and naval domains. Most of these developments still require a human in or on the loop – often for legal reasons – but the technology already exists to produce swarms of deadly, small, autonomous, self-configuring armed drones.

One graphic taste of a possible future for land conflict was the brief but intense war between Azerbaijan and Armenia over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region in late 2020. Being far from Australia and involving unpronounceable names, it received little coverage in the media, but defence planners sat up and took note. It was one of the most lopsided military conflicts in recent history, with Azerbaijan achieving a crushing victory by the application of new technologies, particularly drones equipped with stand-off missiles.

Christian Armenia and Muslim Azerbaijan have been at each other’s throats for a millennium, with neither gaining the ascendancy for long. In a myriad of previous conflicts they have fought themselves to a standstill with one side nominally finishing ahead, and then the other. Not this time.

Armenia fielded a large and heavily armed conventional force structured around hundreds of Russian Main Battle Tanks and heavy air defence systems – but this time Azerbaijan did something different. To their equally heavily armed classic military, they added loitering munitions from Israel and missile-carrying UAVs from Turkey.

As a consequence of arms embargoes on Turkey, that country has developed an impressive defence industry base, helped by input from a number of other nations, including periodically Israel.

This has led to the development of systems such as the Bayraktar TB2 drone, which can carry 150kg of smart munitions and stay aloft for more than 24 hours.

Turkey has successfully used them in small numbers against Kurds on home soil, in Syria and also in Libya.

Because of their size they are invisible to the naked eye when operating at a combat altitude of 20,000 feet and are similarly difficult to detect by radar and electro-optical systems, using a lot of carbon fibre in their construction.

Azerbaijan purchased a number – believed to be several dozen – in mid-2020 and started planning their immediate co-ordinated use against Armenian forces.

After first deploying Israeli loitering munitions to take out Armenian radar sites and missile batteries, the drones then started methodically targeting Armenian armoured vehicles, artillery, fortified positions and command and control nodes, picking them off at will. The brief tally is that in a few weeks they destroyed around 200 Armenian Main Battle Tanks with complete impunity – and gun camera footage showed enemy soldiers cowering in trenches having no idea where the rain of guided missiles was coming from while at the same time being powerless to protect themselves.

The result was that Armenia surrendered and handed Nagorno-Karabakh over to Azerbaijan, possibly ending the centuries-old dispute forever. There were a number of other factors, such as Azerbaijan using mercenaries from Syria to limit their own casualties, and more modern equipment overall – but almost all analysts agree that the critical game-changing elements were the cheap, numerous, semi-autonomous drones using target-recognition software.

If these had been deployed against the Australian Army the consequences might have been equally lopsided because the ADF has not yet made any significant investments in anti-drone systems and possesses no loitering munitions capability.

Current acquisitions such as the Boxer 8×8 and future IFVs have defensive capability against conventional threats with 30mm main guns and antitank guided missiles.

However these would have limited effectiveness against something like a high flying Bayraktar attacking from the near-vertical and even less against a quadcopter purchased from a hobby shop flying in low and fast with a 1kg shaped-charge warhead.

Australian industry is thinking about the anti-drone challenge, with companies such as EOS developing a laser and gun system and DroneShield with electronic countermeasures, but for the moment the army seems to be only politely curious about these products.

The RAAF is focused on air combat but needs to think urgently about defending bases, most of which are highly vulnerable. The RAN is investing in hugely expensive and very capable area air and missile defence systems but would be helpless against a swarm of tiny drones targeting every helicopter on the deck of an LHD.

While the conventional threat from China seems to be the main one, there are plenty of scenarios for future combat that are just as concerning, if not more so.

Source: The Australian “Armed drones in future wars: ADF needs asymmetric technology”

Note: This is The Australian’s article I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the article’s views.


Two Chinese Supercomputers Break Exascale Barrier


By Anton Shilov 4 days ago

A year ahead of the U.S..

photo Tianhe

(Image credit: Top500.org/News.cn)

Two Chinese supercomputers have already broken the notorious exascale barrier, but their developers prefer to stay quiet about it for now. Both systems are reportedly based on China’s homegrown Phytium and Sunway processors and therefore do not use crucial technologies developed outside of Tianxia. If the information is correct, then China is ahead of the U.S. in exascale supercomputing, but there is a catch.

Almost a Year Ahead

Two systems in China achieved 1.3 ExaFLOPS peak performance and around 1.05 ExaFLOPS (or higher) sustained performance in Linpack benchmark in March 2021, reports NextPlatform. However, neither of the machines is currently listed in the global Top 500 list of supercomputers as their developers do not want subcontractors of their partners to get into trouble with the U.S. government.

NextPlatform says it got the information from a source from the U.S. that knows what is going on in China. If the information is accurate, China has beaten the U.S. by almost a year with its exascale system as Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility’s Frontier supercomputer will only start operations in late 2021.

Yet, there are some factors to consider. Frontier’s target performance is about 1.5 TFLOPS, which is almost 50% higher when compared to the sustained performance of China’s exascale supercomputers. Furthermore, Frontier is projected to consume around 30 MW of power, whereas one of its rivals from China has a power consumption of about 35 MW. Last but not least, Chinese developers use existing architectures developed for PetaFLOPS-scale systems and workloads, which may not be optimal in the future.

Sunway Architecture

The first Chinese exascale system is located at the National Supercomputing Center in Wuxi. The supercomputer, called Sunway Oceanlite, was designed by the National Research Center of Parallel Computer Engineering and Technology (NRCPC) and is based on proprietary hybrid manycore Sunway processors discussed in connection with exascale machines earlier this year.

The Shenwei/Sunway CPU architecture has been around since 2016, when the Sunway TaihuLight supercomputer powered by 40,960 Sunway SW26010 processors was launched. The SW26010 CPU uses four heterogeneous clusters(core groups CG) interconnected using a high-performance network-on-chip. Each CG features a protocol processing unit (PPU), one management processing element (MPE) with a 256-bit vector engine, and 64 compute processing elements (CPEs) with the same 256-bit vector engine and a DDR3 memory controller. In total, each SW26010 has four MPEs and 256-bit CPEs that support coherency and run at around 1.5 GHz.

China envisioned that by increasing the number of MPE and CPE cores per CPU and altering their architecture (e.g., by adding support for 512-bit vector instructions to CPEs), it would be possible to build a foundation for up to a 4 ExaFLOPS supercomputer using Sunway architecture.

The report says that NRCPC engineers doubled the number of cores per processor (to 520 cores?) to double the performance per socket and produced their new CPU using a modern process technology to keep power consumption in check. Then they doubled the number of nodes, introduced a new interconnection system and possibly a new storage system to get to 1.03 sustained ExaFLOPS using 42 million 64-bit RISC cores.

A clear advantage of such an approach is that NRCPC retained a familiar architecture that can process both existing and upcoming high-performance computing (HPC) workloads that require FP64 or mixed precision for AI/ML workloads. Meanwhile, that doubling of cores per socket and the number of sockets led to a 35 MW power consumption. This power consumption level is not tremendous, but it shows that the Oceanlite supercomputer is considerably less energy efficient than ORNL’s Frontier.

Phytium Architecture

China’s second exascale supercomputer is the Tianhe-3 machine located in the National Supercomputer Center in Guangzhou, China. The system is powered by Armv8-based Phytium 2000+ (FTP) processors primarily designed for traditional HPC workloads with full FP64 precision and the Matrix 2000+ (MTP) DSP accelerators. There is no information about the sustained performance of Tianhe-3, but its Rpeak performance is reportedly around 1.3 ExaFLOPS and its Rmax performance is comfortably above 1 ExaFLOPS. It is also unclear how much power this supercomputer consumes.

Architecturally, Tianhe-3 resembles Tianhe-2A (launched in 2015) that relied upon Phytium’s FT-2000 CPUs and Matrix 2000 DSP accelerators. To get above 1 ExaFLOPS, developers had to increase the number of processors and accelerators, which probably involved making new silicon with more cores and processing elements made using a thinner fabrication process. Without many details about Tianhe-3 available, it is hard to say how exactly it got to exascale class, but all we can say is that Phytium’s architecture from 2015 was scalable enough.

To develop two of the world’s first exascale supercomputers, scientists from the National Supercomputing Center in Wuxi and the National Supercomputing Center from Guanzhou decided to play it safe and rely on existing architectures. As a result, developers from Sunway Microelectronics (or Shenwei Microelectronics) and Tianjin Phytium Information Technology have successfully designed appropriate chips and produced them using contemporary nodes.

It is unclear which process technologies were used to make the new chips though we can speculate about proven 14nm/16nm-class processes that have good yields and usage not under close watch by the U.S. government. It is also unknown whether China-based SMIC or Taiwan-based TSMC makes the chips. Still, both companies have their advantages: the former cannot be controlled by the U.S. authorities in any way, whereas the latter has proven HPC-oriented libraries for its N16 node.

China’s exascale supercomputers may not be very energy efficient, but if they are indeed used to develop new weapons, power consumption is the last area of concern for their operators. They may also not efficiently scale to 2 ExaFLOPS or 4 ExaFLOPS, but they have plenty of performance to offer today. Furthermore, if their manufacturing is primarily localized, China can build more exascale supercomputers to become more competitive in various spheres.

Tianjin Phytium Information Technology and Sunway Microelectronics (or Shenwei Microelectronics) are on the U.S. Commerce Department’s Entity List, making it extremely hard for them to develop brand-new architectures state-of-the-art chips for future exascale supercomputers. With that said, while China might be the first to get to 1 ExaFLOPS, it may stay there for a while.

1.03 ExaFLOPS is plenty of computing horsepower, but the supercomputing race is accelerating, and only time will tell how fast companies like AMD, Intel, and Nvidia develop technologies enabling 4 ExaFLOPS or 10 ExaFLOPS systems for the U.S. and Europe. But China’s supercomputing capabilities will remain quite formidable for at least a couple of years from now.

Source: tomshardware.com “Two Chinese Supercomputers Break Exascale Barrier”

Note: This is Reuters’ report I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the report’s views.


Katherine Tai: Phone Talks with Liu He to Ease China-US Trade Tension


RTHK

2021-10-29 HKT 08:36

US Trade Representative Katherine Tai says that the relations between China and the US is easy to catch fire. A misunderstanding may give rise to a huge fire. She believes there is great risk in such relations so that she has been dealing with China in order to ease the tension.

The US fears now its trade and tech wars with China may cause a military conflict hard for it to deal with, but China is not afraid of that. China seeks win-win cooperation with the US and can stand US pressures and sanctions well and grow even better in spirte of that. However, the US may be in trouble caused by its own trade and tech attacks at China. That is why Tai talked about China’s needs for food that the US can satify. But there are lots of other countries able satisfy China’s needs so that the US is losing in competition.

Comment by Chan Kai Yee on RTHK’s report, full text of which in Chinese can be viewed at https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1617468-20211029.htm

China, US, trade war, tech war, US-China tension, Liu He, Katherine Tai,


NASA Says We Need Nuclear-Powered Spacecraft to Keep Up With China : ‘We have no time to lose’


By Brad Bergan

Oct 21, 2021 (Updated: Oct 21, 2021 19:22 EDT)

NASA Says We Need Nuclear-Powered Spacecraft to Keep Up With China

Welcome to space race 2.0.

There are many competitors, but it’s mainly one that drove aerospace experts to team up with NASA on Wednesday, urging Congress to hasten and scale-up investments to spur the development of nuclear-propelled spacecraft, in hopes of maintaining the United States’ lead in space, according to a Congressional committee hearing.

And that competing nation is China.

Nuclear-powered spacecraft could keep the US ahead of China

The United States’ space agency thinks spacecraft powered via a nuclear thermal rocket could reach Mars in only three or four months, bringing astronauts to the Red Planet’s doorstep in half the time required by conventional, liquid-propellant rockets. “Strategic competitors including China are aggressively investing in a wide range of space technologies, including nuclear power and propulsion,” said Senior Advisor Bhavya Lal for budget and finance at NASA, during the congressional committee hearing on Wednesday morning. “The United States needs to move at a fast pace to stay competitive and to remain a leader in the global space community.”

This came as additional reports suggested China had successfully tested a new orbital rocket potentially capable of delivering nuclear weapons at supersonic speeds. This is especially dangerous because, lacking the long warning window ballistic missiles afford (since they trace a long, slow arc around the world), hypersonic missiles armed with nuclear warheads could circumvent early-warning systems, causing casualties from a strike to soar like never before. Defense technology and advances for space exploration are categorically distinct, but both both reflect larger geopolitical stakes that are rapidly expanding into space. And, in less than a year, China has made considerable strides to close the gap between its space program, and those of the U.S. and its allies, landing a rover on Mars, beginning assembly of a low-Earth orbit habitable space station, and even striking a deal with Russia to install a base on the surface of the moon.

The ISS vs China’s Tiangong: Which is better?

Video

NASA faces a multitude of challenges before it can put humans on Mars

“If the United States is serious about leading in a human mission to Mars, we have no time to lose,” said U.S. Representative Don Beyer, who is chair of the committee. “Congress has prioritized development of nuclear space propulsion over the past several years, directing about $100 million annually for NASA to advance nuclear thermal propulsion capabilities with the goal of conducting a future in-space flight test,” added Beyer, in the hearing. NASA and the Department of Energy offered $5 million to three different companies in July to design a nuclear-powered spacecraft reactor. Officials at NASA argued that much more funding is necessary, but no solid dollar amount was set during the Wednesday hearing.

A central challenge in developing nuclear engines involves identifying or manufacturing materials capable of withstanding the heat and exposure necessary to function in space, explained Roger M. Myers, who is chair of a committee on space-worthy nuclear engines at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. “The risks associated with [nuclear propulsion] are a fundamental materials challenge that we think is quite likely solvable,” he said during the hearing. While this offers a glimmer of hope, many other challenges are lying in wait on the path to put humans on Mars.

“We’ve landed small rovers there but a spacecraft carrying humans would be much bigger,” said Lal. “We also need to make sure that the environmental control and life support systems can keep [astronauts] alive for two to three years.” But with a recent paper from UCLA researchers revealing that humans can only withstand four-year missions to Mars, advanced propulsion like nuclear-thermal engines could shave off crucial months of transit time, extending the mission window for astronauts investigating the Red Planet’s surface, and also bringing them home faster than was ever possible before.

Source: Interesting Engineering “NASA Says We Need Nuclear-Powered Spacecraft to Keep Up With China: ‘We have no time to lose’”

Note: This is Interesting Engineering’s article I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the article’s views.

Space station, ISS, Tiangong, technology, nuclear-powered spacecraft, Mars, NASA, CNSA,


Chinese researchers achieve quantum advantage in two mainstream routes


By Global Times

Published: Oct 26, 2021 01:18 PM

Light-based quantum computer prototype ‘Jiuzhang 2.0’ Photo: Courtesy of University of Science and Technology of China

Chinese research teams have made marked progress in superconducting quantum computing and photonics quantum computing technology, making China the only country to achieve quantum computational advantage in two mainstream technical routes, while the US has only achieved a “quantum advantage” in superconducting quantum computing, analysts say.

Quantum advantage is a scientific concept that states a quantum computer can do things in some fields beyond the capability of non-quantum or classical computers, but it will never replace classical computers, Yuan Lanfeng, a research fellow at the Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale of the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), told the Global Times on Tuesday.

The research team, headed by the renowned Chinese quantum physicist Pan Jianwei, designed a 66-qubit programmable superconducting quantum computing system, naming it “Zuchongzhi 2.1,” after the noted 5th century Chinese mathematician and astronomer, significantly enhancing the quantum advantage, the Xinhua News Agency reported Tuesday.

“Zuchongzhi 2.1,” is 10 million times faster than the current fastest supercomputer and its calculation complexity is more than 1 million times higher than Google’s Sycamore processor. It’s the first time that China has reached quantum advantage in a superconducting quantum computing system.

“Zuchongzhi 2.1” has achieved a quantum advantage for the first time compared with an earlier processor named “Zu Chongzhi”, a 62-qubit programmable superconducting quantum prototype designed by a Chinese research team from the USTC in May, Lu Chaoyang, a professor of the USTC in Hefei, capital city of East China’s Anhui Province, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

Pan’s team also built a new light-based quantum computer prototype, “Jiuzhang 2.0,” with 113 detected photons, which can implement large-scale Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) 1 septillion times faster than the world’s fastest existing supercomputer, according to the Xinhua News Agency.

Yuan said that the number of detected photons for “Jiuzhang 2.0” increased to 113 from the previous 76 when the quantum computer prototype “Jiuzhang” first came out, which was a major technical breakthrough, as the difficulty increases exponentially with each additional detected photon.

The light-based quantum computer prototype “Jiuzhang” was built in December 2020, led by Pan and Lu, and demonstrated a quantum advantage.

Source: Global Times “Chinese researchers achieve quantum advantage in two mainstream routes”

Note: This is Global Times’ report I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the report’s views.


New variants of Chinese stealth fighters break cover


By Mike Yeo

Oct 30, 12:12 AM

MELBOURNE, Australia – Two new variants of China’s stealth fighters have broken cover in the past three days, including China’s next carrier-based fighter, hinted at during a recent air show.

Photos and videos taken outside the Chengdu Aircraft factory in its namesake city on Tuesday showed a two-seat J-20 stealth fighter in overall primer, confirming persistent rumors such a variant was being developed by the company.

The photos and video, posted on Weibo and other social media portals, distinctly showed the aircraft’s tandem cockpit as it taxied toward the runway for take-off.

It’s not clear what role the back-seater would play, although a logical explanation would be that the rear seat would be occupied by a weapons system officer, or WSO, responsible for operating the J-20′s radar and weapons.

It has also been suggested the two-seat J-20, whose exact designation is as yet unknown, would be a manned-unmanned teaming mothership, controlling China’s version of a loyal wingman or other unmanned combat aerial vehicle or UCAV.

Another possible use for a J-20 WSO is the primary sensor operator coordinating other networked, manned assets. Chinese aviation industry officials have said in the past they saw a potential use of the J-20 as a stealth airborne early warning aircraft, using multiple J-20s as a sensor net.

New carrier-borne fighter

In addition, photos surfaced earlier today of what appears to be China’s stealthy carrier-borne fighter taking to the air for the first time. As previously reported, industry officials said during the recent Zhuhai air show the new carrier-borne stealth fighter would make its first flight in 2021.

The photos also confirm the aircraft, whose exact designation is also unknown and is also left in primer, is a development of the redesigned Shenyang FC-31 stealth fighter that has also been called the J-31 in some quarters and was previously suggested as an export design.

The photos, taken while the aircraft was in flight, show the catapult launch bar on the nose landing gear and what appears to be hinges on the wings that allow them to be folded, a typical feature of carrier-based aircraft to allow the limited space on the flight deck and hangars to be maximized.

The new type will likely equip the Type 003 carrier being built at a shipyard in the coastal megacity of Shanghai, which, unlike China’s two existing carriers, will be fitted with catapults that will allow it to shorten the aircraft launch cycle, as well as enable it to operate larger and heavier aircraft such as the Xi’an KJ-600 turboprop carrier-borne airborne early warning aircraft.

Satellite photos of the Jiangnan-Changxing shipyard where the Type 003 carrier is being built suggest the Type 003 will be equipped with three catapults and will be roughly the same size as the U.S. Navy’s Gerald R. Ford-class carriers.

Source: Defense News “New variants of Chinese stealth fighters break cover”

Note: This is Defense News’ report I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the report’s views.


After ‘Mighty’ J-20 Aircraft, China’s Newest Stealth Fighter Jet Designed For Its Super-Carriers Takes Flight


By EurAsian Times Desk- October 30, 2021

With at least two aircraft carriers leading the charge, the Chinese PLA Navy is rapidly expanding its fleet of warships. After a year of conjecture, photos have begun to surface on social media, hinting at a carrier-capable stealth fighter jet.

If confirmed, this will be China’s second stealth aircraft after the J-20 Mighty Dragon. The latest photographs show a prototype flying for the first time and it’s the first stealthy carrier-capable fighter created outside the US, which boasts its Navy’s F-35C and F-35B short takeoff/vertical landing jets, used by the Marine Corps.

New Chinese naval fighter is seen flying #shenyang FC31

The latest Chinese aircraft has been labeled a variation of the FC-31 by some local plane spotters. A prototype of the land-based FC-31 was first flown in October 2012 but is yet to secure a purchase order from the PLA or any foreign county.

The new aircraft features the same twin canted tail fins, twin engines, and high-mounted cockpit as that of the FC-31, but it also includes a catapult launch bar and a wing-fold mechanism, indicating that it’s designed for carrier missions.

A chin-mounted sensor turret, similar to the F-35’s Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS), and what appears to be a redesigned cockpit canopy layout, with shorter primary transparency, are also seen.

This new fighter is expected to operate from the upcoming Type 003 carrier, as it is prepared for catapult operations from the start.

Rather than depending on the ski-jump ramps installed on the PLAN’s previous two carriers, Liaoning and Shandong, Type 003 design is intended to be outfitted with an electromagnetic aircraft launch system (EMALS).

Shenyang FC-31 – Wikipedia

A silhouette of the FC-31 surfaced on the Aviation Industry Corporation of China’s Weibo microblogging site in December 2019, after which Shenyang revealed the development of a ‘new’ fighter, fuelling rumors that it was the long-awaited FC-31 carrier variant, however, no details were offered.

The PLAN has already shown interest in acquiring a naval version of the FC-31. The KJ-600 and J-15T are all up in the air. A naval variant of the FC-31, which would also require heavier landing gear, could be ready in the near future.

These capabilities will surely aid the PLAN in accomplishing its long-term goal of establishing a blue-water navy.

The PLA Air Force (PLAAF) has already fielded the J-20, which is roughly similar to the US’ F-22 Raptor. FC-31, on one hand, was demoted in favor of J-20 since it was deemed less capable and less expensive. PLAN, on the other hand, appears to be pleased with its carried-based counterpart, and it may acquire it.

China’s New Super-Carrier

Beijing’s Type 003 is considered a significant step forward in its quest to become a worldwide superpower. China’s tremendous naval buildup has included the deployment of aircraft carriers.

Catapults will most likely be used on the next aircraft carrier to launch a larger range of planes more effectively and successfully than the ramp method used on its predecessors. Like catapults, the new carrier is equipped with EMALS (electromagnetic aircraft launch system).

Satellite imagery captured in July 2021 shows that Type 003 is almost 320 meters, which is about 13 meters shorter than the American Ford Class.

China 3rd Carrier

Satellite imagery showing China’s under-construction third aircraft carrier called Type 003.

According to a report released by Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense (MND), China’s area-denial capabilities could improve greatly if the Type 003 aircraft carrier, which was developed domestically, is completed.

According to the study, China is ramping up its “soft kill” and “hard kill” capabilities to damage telecommunications. The former refers to the use of anti-radiation missiles and other weapons to attack and paralyze signal transceiver equipment, while the latter refers to the use of anti-radiation missiles and other weapons to attack and disable signal transceiver equipment.

It is believed that Type 003 will be equipped with 40 fighter aircraft, besides transport and airborne early warning planes as well as anti-submarine warfare (ASW) helicopters.

Evidently, the new carrier version is still in progress, but its low-observable characteristics and modern qualities as a whole would give the PLAN a significant new capacity to match its power-projection objectives.

Written by Ashish Dangwal/EurAsian Times Desk

Source: EurAsian Times “After ‘Mighty’ J-20 Aircraft, China’s Newest Stealth Fighter Jet Designed For Its Super-Carriers Takes Flight”

Note: This is EurAsian Times’ report I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the report’s views.


US Unable to Kill Huawei Just Like Its 20-year War with Taliban


However, Huawei is much better than Taliban as it remains profitable.

SCMP says in its report “Huawei revenue drops 32 per cent in first nine months as US sanctions cripple its once lucrative smartphone business” that Huawei remains profitable as its revenue only drops 32% while its net profit margin has even risen to 10.2 per cent for the three quarters this year, up from 8 per cent in the same period last year.

Obviously, like Afghan Taleban Huawei will rise again promptly when it has got used to US sanctions.

Comment by Chan Kai Yee on SCMP’s report, full text may be viewed at https://www.scmp.com/tech/big-tech/article/3154159/huawei-revenue-drops-32-cent-first-nine-months-us-sanctions-cripple?utm_medium=email&utm_source=cm&utm_campaign=enlz-today_international&utm_content=20211029&tpcc=enlz-today_international&UUID=e3692333-3bc5-45f9-ab9b-53d39ff20411&next_article_id=3154146&article_id_list=3154135,3154141,3154133,3154159,3154146,3154142,3154188,3154156&tc=21&CMCampaignID=53c575cbc703d88c0f60cfbebf543364.


The Nation at Risk—Again | Opinion


JOHN BEL EDWARDS AND KIM REYNOLDS , GOVERNORS

ON 10/29/21 AT 7:30 AM EDT 01:04

In April 1983, the U.S. National Commission on Excellence in Education, a special commission appointed by the secretary of Education, conducted an in-depth analysis of the state of American education and revealed their conclusions in one of the most memorable titles of a government report ever: “A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform.”

As governors and business leaders who serve on the board of Jobs for America’s Graduates (JAG), a national organization that has always operated on a bipartisan basis and has served more than 1.5 million of the nation’s most vulnerable youth over 40 years, we are compelled to report that the nation, once again, is at great risk of losing a critical part of our next generation. This generation will already be numbered among the smallest in our history, and our economy and our country urgently need them all.

The learning loss and student disengagement across America is far broader and deeper than one might imagine. As this is written, many school systems are making final decisions on how to measure student disengagement, dropouts and learning loss. Their reports will be forthcoming over the next several weeks. We know from our work in 1,500 locations in 40 states—from the most urban to the most rural—that the scale of learning loss and disengagement is truly frightening. This conclusion is supported by June and July reports from McKinsey & Co., in which McKinsey measured the impact to be a half-year of learning loss in math and English overall. Some of our most vulnerable youth, including youth of color and youth from low-income families, have lost as much as two-thirds of a school year, or even more in some places.

The learning loss is of national scale. It will take years to overcome, if we are able to restore it. Of equal concern is students’ disengagement from the school system at a massive scale. Michigan has been honest enough to disclose that the K-12 system lost contact with 37 percent of the school children in their system at various points last year. In Detroit, the number was a stunning 48 percent. The superintendent of schools in Dallas has also been straightforward in reporting last spring that they had “lost contact” with 50 percent of their seniors—seniors, who are within eyesight of graduation but could not be found. Multiple estimates tell us 4-6 million more youth than usual have dropped out of school.

In a remarkable twist of fate, it is also true that the economy has been so strong in its recovery that it has attracted many youth to jobs that pay $15-20 per hour with 401(k), health care and tuition benefits—potentially better jobs than they would have secured in previous years with a full high school diploma. For many of the youth our organization serves, work has been a necessity to keep their families in place with shelter and food during the depths of the pandemic, with over 30 million people unemployed in 2020 for much of the year.

The obvious question is, “What do we do about it?”

If there is any good news, it is that we do know how to help even the most vulnerable youth succeed in school, work, post-secondary education—and life. Jobs for America’s Graduates has 40 years of experience, as we have noted, and achieved remarkable outcomes through the pandemic across our 1,500 locations, from the inner cities of Detroit, St. Louis, Phoenix and New York to the most rural parts of Montana, Nevada, the Mississippi Delta and Native American reservations. The evidence is compelling that, properly organized and executed, with well-prepared and highly engaged staff, we can achieve truly extraordinary results.

Jobs for America’s Graduates’ most recent results, collected on May 31 at the conclusion of 12 months of follow-up services to our graduates, who were derived from the lowest-performing 40 percent of the population, makes that case. After our 12 months of follow-up services, at the very height of the pandemic, the JAG Class of 2020, achieved the following results:

—A graduation rate of 96.7 percent—the best in our history.

—Employment rate: 64 percent—the best ever.

—Full-time jobs: 82 percent—the best ever.

—Further education rate: 40.49 percent—up from last year while enrollments in higher education were down 10 percent nationally.

—Full-time placement: 92 percent (percentage of employed JAG graduates with full-time placement in jobs, college, the military or some combination) once again, the highest ever.

In Louisiana and Iowa, we have witnessed the extraordinary impact this program can have on the lives and futures of entire families, schools and communities.

On the JAG website, you can read our Top 10 Lessons Learned, which have been the key components in helping our people at the front lines achieve the outcomes noted above, drawn from the many decades of working with underserved and challenged youth. These lessons demonstrate what it takes to create sustained and consistent success.

Certainly, the future of the nation rests on the futures of millions of America’s youth who are now gravely at risk. Their futures will depend on the sustained leadership and commitment of government, schools and the private sector to come together around solutions that have been proven to work at scale and over time—and then doing more of what works on a long-term and sustained basis. Demonstration projects and small-scale efforts are wonderful. However, the risk we are facing as a nation calls for truly large-scale and highly coordinated public and private sector engagements that bring to bear the very best of “what works.”

The federal government has provided states, local governments and schools with an extraordinary amount of new funding to help mitigate the impacts of the pandemic, especially for education. We, therefore, do have the resources to take to scale what works and keep it there as we try to mitigate and overcome the worst damage to the American education system in history.

You can be certain that Jobs for America’s Graduates, with the 14 governors serving on our board, along with a range of national corporate and community leaders, stands ready to share our experience in what works. We are ready to help in any way we can with both the design and execution of the mitigation strategies, based on what we know works.

Buried in these challenges is the clear opportunity to “Build Back Better,” (in the words of President Joe Biden) our schools and educational systems and to better focus education on readiness for work since, to paraphrase the words of President Ronald Reagan, “The best social program is a job.” The economy needs all our young people like never before.

It is up to all of us in both the public and private sectors. We have the money. We have proven ways to help youth succeed. The remaining question is, will we connect those dots to do what works at enough scale to meet the need?

Governor John Bel Edwards (D-La.) and Governor Kim Reynolds (R-Iowa) participate on the board of Jobs for America’s Graduates, an organization helping young people of truly great promise succeed both in school and on-the-job, leading to productive and rewarding careers.

The views expressed in this article are the writers’ own.

Source: Newsweek “The Nation at Risk—Again | Opinion”

Note: This is Newsweek’s article I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the article’s views.


‘Hundreds’ Of China Hypersonic Tests Vs. 9 US; Hyten Says US Moves Too Slowly


Gen. Hyten said he’s “probably” going to approve “today or tomorrow a new requirement for Integrated Air and Missile Defense,” which is a pillar of the Joint Warfighting Concept (JWC).

By COLIN CLARK

on October 28, 2021 at 5:00 PM

Gen. John Hyten (File)

WASHINGTON: In what may be his valedictory remarks as vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. John Hyten continued his quest to prod the Pentagon acquisition elephant to move faster. One telling example: China, he said, has performed “hundreds” of tests of hypersonic weapons in the last five years, compared to nine the United States has performed.

How did it come to this? Hyten pointed to a a painting, located on the fourth floor of the Pentagon, to illustrate how things have changed for the US military since the days of the space race.

“So I like rockets, but it’s just a rocket taking off, and it’s a little rocket. And there’s actually nothing else in the picture except the rocket taking off, but there’s the little label on the bottom. It says, Discover 14. And why that’s so cool to me, is that Discover One through 13 failed.” Discover 14, in fact, carried America’s first spy satellite, one of the Corona series, into orbit.

“We launched one through 13 and they failed in like 18 months because our approach at the time was to test and instrument the heck out of it, fail, learn what failed, build another one, fire, learn what failed. Build another one, fire it, learn what failed. If you want to go fast,” he said. “That’s what you do.”

That fear of failure that now dominates the US military is not holding back competitors like China — or, in what may be a surprising example, North Korea.

“As opposed to his father and his grandfather, [Kim Jong Un] decided not to kill the scientists and engineers when they failed. He decided to encourage and let them learn by failing and they did,” Hyten said. “And so the 118th biggest economy in the world — 118th! — has built an ICBM nuclear capability because they test and they understand risk.”

But for the Pentagon, there are myriad obstacles in the way of such an approach these days. There’s the bureaucracy. There’s Congress. And, Hyten said, of course there’s the media.

“So now, whatever you’re testing, whether it’s a missile, an airplane, missile defense system, if it fails, you guys put it on the front page of every newspaper in the world, in the country, that says, ‘missile defense test fails.’ There’s one test that we actually meant to fail because we were trying to drive it to failure. And the headline still said, ‘missile defense test fails,’ and there’s hearings and everything that we go through and we stopped for two years.”

Hyten pointed to hypersonic technology as the “perfect example” of America’s acquisition problems.

“We were developing hypersonics ahead of everybody in the world and the first test failed. The first test of everything fails. So the first test fails, and we have two years of investigation into why did it fail,” he said. “Two years, and we launched again, and it fails. So, we cancel the program. We stop and then others start building hypersonics. They start doing it the way we used to do it and they start moving fast. And so we start the programs again.”

He pointed to the latest hypersonic test where some technology failed. “But now we’re going to study that to death before we move on again. We have to understand risk and development. Technology is hard,” he said.

China’s Hypersonic Weapons

Hyten implied this morning, but did not state categorically, that China has built and tested what appears to be a Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS).

FOBS technology is not new, but Hyten described it “as highly destabilizing.” And China’s reported use of a nuclear-capable hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) as the pointy end of the stick would be a twist. The Soviets deployed a FOBS — which combines a low-flying missile and nuclear warhead that reaches Low Earth Orbit, but does not remain in space for a full turn about the Earth — from 1969 to 1983. China began an effort in the early 1970s, but suffered test failures with its launcher, and gave up. They appear to have resumed the effort and succeeded.

On the issue of China, which Hyten noted does not pose the imminent existential threat to the United States that Russia does because of its huge nuclear arsenal, the outgoing vice chairman said recent evidence from western China of new ICBM fields shows “every indication” that China is abandoning its longstanding policy of minimum deterrence.

“You don’t need to develop the kind of capabilities they’re developing for a minimum deterrence. The work they’re doing on hypersonics, the work to fill out the triad, the work to build both a fixed-base ICBM program and a mobile ICBM program at the same time, to put ballistic missiles on bombers, to put ballistic missiles on submarines — you know, when you look at that structure, that is not a minimum deterrence model,” Hyten said.

He brushed aside any commitments by any country to a so-called “no first use” policy.

“What I worry about is capability. And if you’re a military officer, you have to worry about the capability and the possibility that an adversary will use that capability against you,” he said. “And so you have to assume that capability is meant for a reason and plan for that. So, you know, the political side has to worry about the words. The military side, we have to focus on that capability.”

In the only breaking news of the day, Hyten said he was “probably” going to approve “today or tomorrow a new requirement for Integrated Air and Missile Defense.” This is a pillar of the Joint Warfighting Concept (JWC), which is central to All Domain Operations.

The first four strategic directives, issued in June, defined joint requirements for Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2), joint fires, contested logistics and information dominance.

The IAMD requirement arose from a capability gap review specifically aimed at informing the Missile Defense Review, a major policy document that both assesses America’s missile defense posture and provides guidance on future investments.

The Missile Defense Review and the Nuclear Posture Review will be integrated as part of the National Defense Strategy, due in January.

Source: Breaking Defense “‘Hundreds’ Of China Hypersonic Tests Vs. 9 US; Hyten Says US Moves Too Slowly”

Note: This is Breaking Defense’s article I post here for readers’ information. It does not mean whether I agree or disagree with the article’s views.